EDIT: The only reason why I still had it at this point was because I could use it with other apps. However, now that my Spotify Subscription is cancelled, it doesn’t work with anything. It’s mildly infuriating because today, I can’t still use it with other apps like I was able to yesterday.

Please don’t make the same mistake I made. No one should buy this.

  • ★ 𝐘𝖔𝖕𝖕𝖆★
    link
    fedilink
    English
    162 years ago

    Lol why did you buy something without reading the fine print. Now suffer and keep complaining. Never buy anything that has a subscription model. If you paid $100 , that thing is yours ans you should be able to use it the way you want. Checkout YouTube Louis Rossman videos for some education.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      Checkout YouTube Louis Rossman videos for some education.

      I think you don’t watch him or you are troll(or both) because first thing you is started to blame the customer

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 years ago

    About a year ago, maybe two years ago? Spotify started sending me feedback requests about the “Car Thing.” I was super confused about why anyone would buy something they could just use their phone for, and I finally caved and sent some feedback saying “I already have my phone, I don’t want more devices in my car. This is a bad idea.” And the requests stopped.

    Guess they went through with it. Makes no sense to me. I use Spotify everyday, often for most of the day, I really have no issue with what I’m paying for, but that “Car Thing” just seemed like the most braindread venture.

    Just my $.02

    • pjhenry1216
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      I think it’s selling point is supposed to be voice commands and haptic controls (actual knob and what not). The interface does look like it’d be superior to the phone (at least a non-android auto or whatever Apple’s is called) though I dunno if it’s $100 superior.

  • ineedaunion
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22 years ago

    Sucks but that’s what happens when you support capitalism. 🏴‍☠️🦜⛵

    • R0cket_M00se
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 years ago

      Something tells me they just didn’t realize someone would buy a Spotify car play without already having a subscription.

      I mean really, you’re too cheap for 9.99/m but you’ll drop 100 bucks for something your phone already does?

      Seems like OP is just in a very unique situation that Spotify didn’t expect anyone to be in.

      • Fushuan [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        9.99/m is 119.88/y and it doesn’t stop. Maybe OP thought that the purchase was a one time purchase, and I don’t really blame him, since why would the thing exist if phones with a subscription can already do that it does?

        • R0cket_M00se
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Doesn’t stop? You sign on the dotted line for a lifetime of payments? You can’t cancel your subscription?

          since why would the thing exist if phones with a subscription can already do that it does?

          That’s the exact logic that would lead someone with an ounce of intelligence to go “oh yeah, this product is a completely stupid piece of shit that’s marketed toward people with more money than brain cells.”

          Did it say anywhere on the package that it gets you a lifetime subscription to Spotify? No. Does OP understand that Spotify works on a subscription model? Probably, Saas isnt fucking new.

          This is the kind of boy-who-cried-wolf bullshit that keeps corporations from actually being held accountable, because people who want better worker’s rights and taxes on corporations look like idiots when lumped in with children like you who consider personal responsibility and thinking for yourself to be too scawy.

        • @[email protected]
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 years ago

          I don’t really blame him

          He bought a piece of convenience tech designed for a specific piece of software, when said convenience tech is totally unnecessary to the function of that software, then got mad that he needed the software

          I am shocked that everyone in this thread isn’t roasting this dude nonstop. He’s an idiot.

          • R0cket_M00se
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            They just don’t consider personal responsibility to even exist. It’s the corporation’s fault they spent a hundred bucks on a thing your old phone and a 15 dollar magnetic mount could have done for you, because said device needs a subscription service.

            I had a guy tell me in this thread that I had “privilege” for saying Spotify didnt expect people without a paid subscription to be spending money on such an overpriced device. OP is throwing hundo’s away on stupid shit but it HAS to be the corpos fault somehow, people will toss logic right out the window to keep the cognitive dissonance at bay.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        They say never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by neglect, ignorance or incompetence. But with a corporations I’m pretty sure its the other way around.

        • R0cket_M00se
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          I’d usually agree but this product seems exclusively intended for someone who’s heavily into Spotify, and the marketing clearly states you need a subscription.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            and the marketing clearly states you need a subscription.

            So they knew. It was by design.

            • R0cket_M00se
              link
              fedilink
              English
              32 years ago

              Knew what? That people buying the device already have one?

              You still have it backwards. They didn’t sell you the device to get you on the subscription, they assumed only people with money to spend on a subscription would WASTE A HUNDRED BUCKS ON SOME DUMB SHIT LIKE THIS.

              • Monkeytennis
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                Am I missing something, or would basically any old smartphone work in place of this? I have a Pixel which sits in a cradle and takes care of anything I’d use this for. I guess a physical button or dial might be nice, but I have a volume dial on the car dash.

                Seems plainly obvious that it’ll require a sub. It’s a Spotify box.

                • R0cket_M00se
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 years ago

                  You’re correct, I have a five or six year old kindle fire i got for like 60 bucks that I rooted and installed stock android on, it’s just a really cheap tablet now. Works perfectly for stuff like this.

                  My last smartphone would also have worked.

                  This whole thread is just a bunch of moron-consumer apologists. There are plenty of legitimate reasons to hate corporations and their practices, but this is just a bad purchase and buyers remorse packaged as big corpos fault.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          I mean, on all the purchase advertisements they said you must have Spotify premium to use this.

          They subsidized the price the device based on the expected return from convincing people to keep their subscriptions. Since it supports other clients they probably also have to manage software updates.

          Spotify is a bag of dicks for a lot of other reasons but this really doesn’t seem to be one of them.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            Thank Faust there are times he is wrong! At least I know we live in not the worst world imaginable.

              • Nightwatch Admin
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                Oh even without the controversies, the eating of miscellaneous foot attachments is wrong enough on its own.

                Edit: I do btw fully agree with rms being a crude piece of failed excrement

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  10
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  I didn’t mention that? I don’t write on Wikipedia.

                  But don’t you think his views on pedophilia are unacceptable? He says he has changed his mind and that’s great but doesn’t excuse what he said.

                  I usually agree with his views on software but the rest is often questionable

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      “Just find another job place to live head unit”

      -deliberately obtuse bootlickers

  • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1692 years ago

    That’s really dissapointing, did Spotify seriously release a hardware device that expensive, and mandates a subscription to operate?

    It’s a shame because it looks quite nice too, and is sadly guaranteed to be e-waste at some point

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      222 years ago

      I mean, it’s basically a cheap smartphone or computer tablet, with a lower resolution, but nice quality screen, and a giant volume spinner. $100 does not get you much at all in the phone and tablet space. I don’t think there’s much of any profit margin, if at all for it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1232 years ago

      Are you kidding me? It’s been par for the course as far as car assessors go. Sirus radio was like 100 and still required a subscription. A lot of GPS were that price and most had subscriptions.

      • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Just because it’s percieved as normal doesn’t mean it’s something we should put up with though.

        With GPS subscriptions (the ones I’m aware of anyway) they will still navigate you from A to B when you stop paying the subscription, you usually just miss out on traffic updates, map updates and other localized enhancements. If there are any that deny you navigation outside the subscription that’s plain scummy IMO.

        I’m not familiar with Sirius Radio but from what I can see online, it’s a satellite radio subscription service that seems to bring new things to the table (like starting a radio station at the beginning of a last song etc). The hardware appears to actually serve a purpose, i.e. it’s the satellite receiver for the radio service subscription. I believe we could compare this to buying a Starlink dish for internet access, and paying the monthly subscription. The spotify device shown here is not a standalone device and is only fitted with bluetooth IIRC, requiring a phone for operation.

        In comparison to Spotify, Sirius does not appear to have ever had a free plan - whereas Spotify does… I see is no reason why Spotify could not make their free plan usable on this device.

        Edit: fix typo

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          The device is free to premium users. It’s a marketing device for the premium subscription.

          The box clearly states that a premium subscription is required.

          • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Assuming you’re referring to the Sirius radio, it makes the Spotify device an even worse proposition IMO

            Edit: Clarify assumption

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            Glad to see someone mention that the subscription being required for use is clearly conveyed. It’s not like this was some hidden information

      • atocci
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        I think I got an Echo Auto for $25 (during the public tests). It doesn’t need any kind of a subscription to use as far as I’m aware. It only does streaming still, but there are Alexa skills that let you stream from your Plex or Jellyfin server.

      • airportlineOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        I could still use it for playing music in other apps. Now I can’t.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        Those I don’t fault. Sirius has satellites to maintain and they don’t get ad revenue.

        GPS makers, well making maps on that scale is very expensive. Not everyone can be google and give it away to end consumers by harvesting user data and selling ads to businessplaces.

        Spotify though, fair enough to charge for the hardware but once bought should work with the ad-supported version of their product…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          The hardware is free for subscribers…

          If you buy it outright it tells you that you need a subscription.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        642 years ago

        Don’t know why you’re being downvoted - enshittification as a viable consumer business model was pretty much proven in the auto space.

        Just like they want to charge you to use the heated seats you’re paying the gas to lug around anyway

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Just like they want to charge you to use the heated seats you’re paying the gas to lug around anyway

          That’s not the same thing at all. As bad as e.g. Sirius or GPS subscription might be, at least with those the subscription is for ongoing access to new data being transmitted to you. In contrast, a subscription purely for the use of hardware already included in the car is literally theft.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      I considered getting one of these a couple years ago and saw Spotify was discounting them heavily and even giving them away for free in some cases. I didn’t wind up getting one but do wish they would release a simple player + speaker like this for home use.

  • Brave Little Hitachi Wand
    link
    fedilink
    English
    38
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    You paid $100 to play music that you didn’t own. It feels mean to put it that way, but it was never a foolproof plan if we’re being honest.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      There’s a difference between purchasing a product and paying for a service.

      Paying for Spotify would be the latter.

      • Brave Little Hitachi Wand
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        Water is a liquid. The human body can only breathe gases. When you breathe a liquid, that is called drowning.

        Boom.

        🫳

        🎤

        I agree, smugly stating the obvious is fun. I didn’t think it would be, but you won me over.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 years ago

          Actually, they’ve developed breathable liquid like from The Abyss. It’s been a thing since the 90s.

          If you want to smugly state the obvious, at least be accurate.