• Slyme
    link
    fedilink
    English
    72 years ago

    Honestly, I only use it for when a site will not work in FFX-based browsers

  • OBG
    link
    fedilink
    62 years ago

    Who cares, it’s a browser…use whatever you like.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    332 years ago

    did not know about the founder’s past, cheers for this. whenever i’m forced to open a chromium browser for something from now on, i’ll be using vivaldi.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    15
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I don’t see any of this as legitimate reasons to stop using Brave.

    • yes the CEO donated $1k some 10 years ago to anti-LGBT stuff, and that’s bad, but kinda small fries in the totality of factors.

    • ads. Firefox has ads and trackers just like Brave. You can disable them on either.

    • you can also disable crypto.

    • hijacking affiliate codes is unethical and should be stopped but don’t actually affect me in any way.

    What else ya got?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      62 years ago

      I did too for a while. I’ve since switched to librex.

      It’s kinda like ten years ago google. It may use google as it’s source for all I know. It does a pretty great job of stripping out SEO fluff.

      Link to firefox plugin.

  • ArugulaZ
    link
    fedilink
    232 years ago

    Stop using it with honey mustard sauce! Stop using it with tangy sweet and sour sauce! Stop eating the new fiesta Brave salad! Stop enjoying Brave on the patio, in the car, or on the boat… wherever good times are had!

    • Teali0
      link
      fedilink
      82 years ago

      🎵 Pop a poppler in your mouth
      When you come to Fishy Joe’s
      What they’re made of is a mystery
      Where they come from no one knows 🎵

  • IHeartBadCode
    link
    fedilink
    1742 years ago

    Brave Software, the company behind the browser of the same name, was founded by Brendan Eich. He’s best known as the creator of JavaScript from his days at Netscape Communications

    Say no more fam.

  • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    To be honest the best chromium based browser I’ve used (when I’m forced to use a chromium based browser) is the Samsung internet one. It has a dark mode that actually works and protects my vampire eyes lol.

    Never used brave because I heard all of the scammy ad network and crypto stuff years ago, immediately put me off it. Now learning that the creator probably hates me, it’s just another reason not to touch it.

  • CaptainBasculin
    link
    fedilink
    772 years ago

    The fact is i don’t care about these things. All it matters is that Brave uses Chromium, therefore I’ll never touch it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      412 years ago

      from the article…

      Ultimately, Brave Browser is the apparatus of an advertising company, a bloated and complicated experience for the average user, and the pet project of the person kicked out of Mozilla for continuing to defend harmful political donations. If you want a privacy-focused web browser, use Firefox or Vivaldi. If you want to support your favorite content creators and publishers, turn on advertisements or support them through the methods they already support (Patreon, Ko-Fi, and so on). Brave Browser is irredeemable, and you should not use it under any circumstances.

      I don’t use brave and I am not interested in using it, so YMMV.

      • Grownbravy [they/them]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        332 years ago

        because it’s shit

        All those i figured

        and the pet project of the person kicked out of Mozilla for continuing to defend harmful political donations

        This one is interesting to me because it begins to explains why it has the same terrible clipart lions head logo as a bunch of deadend political parties, groups, and candidates. It seems pretty obvious now

        • BelieveRevolt [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          312 years ago

          Everyone who I’ve ever seen talk about using Brave has been a chud, so I always thought it was sus.

      • cloudless
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        Is Vivaldi good for privacy? It is closed-source and I don’t understand its business model.

        • Eager Eagle
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          exactly, there’s a lot of trust involved in using Vivaldi. I don’t know why someone recommends it over Brave in the name of privacy.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          Not according to PrivacyTests.org. It lacks a lot of state partitioning, amongst other things. Just FYI, the front end UI is closed source, but the backend/engine is open source, because they’re just another chromium spin off.

    • HotSoda [love/loves]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      402 years ago

      I love it when people just flat out refuse to read the article. Why read when you can comment instead?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        You could ignore my reply, but instead you decided to attack me. I don’t know what’s your problem, but it’s between two years right in your head, so please leave me out of it.

  • Hal-5700X
    link
    fedilink
    36
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Dude, this is a Firefox. Why tell us not use something what…95% of people here are not using in the first place?

    EDIT: The crypto stuff is opt-in. You don’t have to use Brave Shields (in browser ad blocker). It can be turned off. Now you can use uBlock Origin or another ad blocker.

    About the CEO, I can’t see nothing about his beliefs reflecting in his work. Looks like he kept them separated. I’m not for said beliefs.

    EDIT 2: Also Brendan Eich is a co-founder of Mozilla. So if you’re not going to use Brave because of him. How can you use Firefox?

    • pjhenry1216
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Just ignore everything I said here. I misinterpreted stuff. My bad.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        this is a Firefox

        It’s obvious that op meant that we are on r/Firefox, therefore there’s no need to shill against brave.

        • pjhenry1216
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Given what I had said about it, the interpretation made sense. I already apologized. There’s no need to correct me after the author already did. It adds nothing but trying to be condescending.

      • Hal-5700X
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Claiming it’s Firefox is a bit misleading. Claiming its suggesting it’s equivalent to saying don’t use Firefox is outright deceptive and/or downright ignorant.

        I’m sorry but what?

  • Ginkko117
    link
    fedilink
    182 years ago

    I use Brave as a second browser (mainly to separate different activities) and did not have any issues with it apart from dragging tabs between monitors (it creates an additional empty tab sometimes when doing this). Turned off all unnecessary stuff right when I first launched it and that’s it. No bloat, no issues, just works. Didn’t know about this CEO controversy but seeing as it was a long time ago, don’t think it’s a valid reason to not use Brave. And both logo and name are cool.
    It’s a solid option which we don’t really have a lot of in open source space

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      I use it for streaming because the ad block works on spotify and YouTube. I could never get spotify working on Firefox consistently.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      152 years ago

      mainly to separate different activities

      Firefox has profiles AND container tabs for exactly this though.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          52 years ago

          I’m talking about the browser user profiles, where your user data (bookmarks, passwords, extensions) is stored.

          Firefox puts them into profiles so that you can change between those sets, as if you’re a different user, without changing user accounts at the OS level.

          This isn’t about online accounts.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              42 years ago

              Yep, Mozilla doesn’t tie your Firefox settings to your Mozilla account. It does require it for syncing between devices though.

              Glad to get people to understand Firefox better. Hope my comment didn’t come out as too crass or anything 😅

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              42 years ago

              What are you talking about? Firefox doesn’t need an email address for container tabs or separate profiles, and I think you can still host your own sync server if you want that capability.

              I haven’t checked if Container tabs work on Torn Browser, but that’s my go-to for anonymity.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  2
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  Yup, on Firefox, profiles are just directories of settings, and you can have as many as you choose. AFAIK, few people use them, since you can get most of that behavior with container tabs. For example, at work, I have one container group for work Gmail, one for personal, and if my wife uses it, she can open another group for her stuff.

                  I’d use profiles for a shared login on a computer, but I’d just use separate user accounts instead. I use container tabs for multiple logins for the same service on one profile. Switching then just means opening a new tab with that container group.

    • pjhenry1216
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I mean, there’s simply just Firefox. Which is apparently not the basis for Brave. It does sound like Brave collects data so it still seems shady.

      Edit: could have sworn brave was built on Firefox. It’s not. It’s chromium. Which in my opinion counts against it as I’d rather avoid a monopoly considering how much control Google has over chromium and the inherent biases Google has.

        • pjhenry1216
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          My bad. Not sure why I thought that. Still. Firefox is still a better alternative in my opinion.

          • Onihikage
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            You might have been thinking of Mullvad Browser, which is based on Firefox and came out somewhat recently. Other privacy-focused browsers based on Firefox include Librewolf and Tor browser.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2832 years ago

    Summary:

    • Brendan Eich’s donation to Proposition 8, opposing same-sex marriage.
    • Backlash and resignation from Mozilla CEO position due to controversy.
    • Creation of Brave Software and fundraising despite backlash.
    • Plan to replace ads with Brave’s own ad network faced legal challenges.
    • Introduction of Basic Attention Tokens (BAT) cryptocurrency for ad incentives.
    • Privacy scandal involving affiliate codes added to URLs for revenue collection.

    Please at least copypaste the content when you post…

    • iByteABit [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      772 years ago

      I don’t usually judge by looks, but you can just tell that Brendan Eich is an insecure fragile person with many mental problems.

      I don’t know what’s worse: The whole anti same-sex marriage deal or inventing Javascript.

      Probably Javascript…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        172 years ago

        I don’t know what’s worse: The whole anti same-sex marriage deal or inventing Javascript.

        Probably Javascript…

        Heh. Made me smile.

        Here, have an upvote! ;)

    • whouOP
      link
      fedilink
      92 years ago

      oh sorry! forgot about it adding a description. will do next time.