• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    36
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Ah yes, the time proven effective strategy to get the poor back on board the against-their-own-interests train:

    "Unchecked Capitalism will save you from the problems that Unchecked Capitalism directly caused!" 🤣

    If that sounds reasonable, here’s a solution for climate change: lets double the amount of carbon shit we’re pumping into the air. Fuck it, double or nothing!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    79
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    How about we STOP TIEING ESSENTIAL FUCKING SERVICES TO OUR CORPORATE FUCKING OVERLORDS.

    Jfc

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      232 years ago

      We tried to de-couple healthcare from employment about a decade ago, and all the support for some form of universal healthcare seemed to vanish overnight as the general population fell for corporate propaganda and right-wing scare tactics.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        I always wondered why neighborhoods, HOAs, and apartment buildings etc don’t form their own insurance plans to entice people to live there. Businesses get better rates for group plans so why don’t other organizations? Insurance isn’t my field so I don’t know if it’s possible or how it would work, just curious.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          52 years ago

          It probably would work if you had a large enough pool of people, but how much bigger can you get than if 300 million people were pooled together and collectively they negotiated rates on drugs and doctor visits? Thus the ultimate idea of some form of universal coverage.

          Where your idea kind of falls apart is that you need someone to manage all this. Good luck getting Kenny in apartment 5D to take care of this when he can’t even turn the volume of his TV down after 10 PM. But I think obama care kind of does this on a state level. I could be wrong, but I think that’s what the various marketplaces they talk about are. But each state manages it differently. Not shockingly, red states tend to mismanage things and offer worse services than blue states. In the end it is all a crutch. This should be on a national level like every other industrialized nation offers.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            22 years ago

            “Where your idea kind of falls apart is that you need someone to manage all this”

            This is nearly nonsensical. It’s not a completely fleshed out idea, but just because the commenter hasn’t named a possible manager doesn’t mean it’s bad.

            You think anybody is gonna make the perfect proposal to solve our problems in 50 words or less?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              Back in his heyday Kenny in 5D could have. But not after his divorce. That really broke him. He missed his kids, but that bitch of an ex wife wouldn’t let him see them. He was just a shell of a man after that. Of course now Kenny in 5D is dead. Rest in peace, Kenny in 5D.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            32 years ago

            This should be on a national level like every other industrialized nation offers.

            No disagreement there! Only comment is that Kenny in 5D can’t possibly be worse than Carol in HR lol

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              Kenny in 5D actually died 2 weeks ago but his body hasn’t decomposed yet because he has his AC set for 65 degrees. Eventually it will stink up the place and force Tom in 4D to relocate for 3 weeks as his apartment is cleaned up after Kenny in 5D’s body liquefied and soaks through the floor and into Tom in 4D’s ceiling.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    592 years ago

    This strikes me as a “you will own nothing and be happy” solution. Instead of paying workers a fair wage so they can put something into savings for a rainy day, you will be at the mercy of your employer for support.

    This seems to be the trend. In the future, you will have most of your needs at least met, but not through your own means, because you will have no means whatsoever. You will not be able to take care of yourself without your corporation parent. This is a very coercive situation.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      72 years ago

      While wages are obviously a significant factor here, I still wouldn’t be surprised if the primary cause for this is simply the fact that most people aren’t very skilled at managing their personal finances.

      I make a pretty decent living, but in discussions with my coworkers who earn as much as I do, and often even more, it becomes apparent that many of them are essentially living from hand to mouth. In contrast, I have a year’s worth of wages invested in stocks and enough cash to purchase two more cars like the one I already own. Finances and saving are subjects I enjoy discussing, but the vast majority of people have zero interest in them, and this has a real impact on their lives.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        You’ve been downvoted, but I get what you’re saying. There’s just people who never really got out of the pocket money model of spending whatever you have all the time.

        It’s quite possible to do everything right and still end up with not enough, but I definitely work with people who could do better. One guy, between them and their partner earn more than I do, yet are in far worse financial shape, and it’s simply because they see money in their account, and see no reason not to spend it, meaning those little events (that don’t happen all the time, but do happen) like a car failing an MOT, or a boiler breaking in winter, or a roof leak means they have no way to cover it.

        I think there’s definitely a market for managed bank accounts, that handle your bills and outgoings, save up an emergency pot for you, put into investments when that fills up, and give you a spuff money pot for takeaways and other frivolous shit.

        City life can also be expensive, and too few people move away when it isn’t working for them.

    • Flying Squid
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      152 years ago

      I’m not doing well healthwise right now and my employers told me that they were concerned about my health and I could take as many unpaid sick days as I want.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1292 years ago

    Henry Ford may have been a prick, but even he had the common sense to realize paying your workers enough to buy your products was mutually beneficial. All this wealth hoarding going on serves nobody but the ultra rich that are simply addicted to watching numbers go up.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        72 years ago

        It’s a post hoc rationalization of why he paid more. He paid more because he literally couldn’t staff his factory because the assembly line work was so dull.

    • Poggervania
      link
      fedilink
      642 years ago

      Which is why I’m hesitant to actually call those greedy fucks “capitalists”, because they’re the very antithesis of capitalism. They literally break the system for their own benefit, and thanks to US politicians to being corrupt enough to allow themselves to be bought out for a few bucks from said greedy fucks, nobody in power is incentivized to actually do something.

      Capitalism works with money flowing constantly, and it needs that to work well. When you have some Warren Buffet and Elongated Muskrat kind of people just hoarding wealth… well, you get the shitshow that is the the US today. $300B circulating in the system would be awesome, and I would think that is a good indicator of a healthy economy; but when $300B is pretty much tied to one person, then congrats, we missed the point of capitalism.

      • Sippy Cup
        link
        fedilink
        402 years ago

        The only goal of capitalism is to raise capital. Any method that raises capital is as valid as any other. The working class people are essentially just a bank to draw capital from, nothing more. Not to them anyway.

        Anything else they told you about capitalism in school was bullshit. It does one thing. Increase capital through any means.

        There is a logical end point where the working class can keep no capital for themselves, and produce it until they die. And what happens when there’s no more shareholder value to extract from the working class I wonder?

    • BeakersBunsen
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      Wasn’t he the one that wanted to do full factory towns, not sure that money was ever going to leave him.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      It doesn’t, actually. You pay all of your workers more so some of them might buy your product, maybe?

      The increase in wages for everyone will help, but then capitalists have no choice to attract labor. See: the wages now adjusted vs. the inflation

      https://www.bls.gov/charts/usual-weekly-earnings/usual-weekly-earnings-over-time-total-men-women.htm#

      This chart shows the median wage has gone up since the pandemic, even if using 2023 dollars

      So the wages in the US are better than they have ever been, even inflation adjusted. You can go back as long as you want, they were not higher in the 50s, contrary to popular belief

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        So the wages in the US are better than they have ever been, even inflation adjusted. You can go back as long as you want, they were not higher in the 50s, contrary to popular belief

        That’s just obviously false. Are you saying people who could pay for college by working summer jobs, and who could buy a car and house and raise a family on a single income were making less than people today who spend decades paying off student loans, and who can barely afford rent on a one-bedroom apartment?

          • Flying Squid
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            22 years ago

            In part because black people can own those things more easily now.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              Sure, but people pining for the lifestyle of the 50s forget they are looking at the top 10% of incomes. Life in the 50s wasn’t that good compared to now for the AVERAGE person

              • Flying Squid
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                32 years ago

                Except they had things like the G.I. bill which gave them money to go to college or buy a house and improve their lives. Every man who was in the military in WWII had that as an option. Maybe some didn’t utilize it, but that was by choice. If you include their spouses and children, that’s way more than 10% of the population.

                Wages were comparatively higher too.

                But I don’t know anyone on the left pining for the lifestyle of the 1950s, that’s something conservatives want. I wouldn’t mind the wages of the 1950s (adjusted for inflation) and I wouldn’t mind taxing the rich at 90%, but I sure would mind the racism and the sexism.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  12 years ago

                  I wouldn’t mind the wages of the 1950s (adjusted for inflation)

                  Adjusted for inflation, much lower than today

                  I wouldn’t mind taxing the rich at 90%

                  There were loopholes that allowed most people to pay much less, so that’s why they closed those loopholes later

  • theodewere
    link
    fedilink
    7
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Republicans in Congress: THOSE ARE ROOKIE NUMBERS!! I WANNA SEE 85-90% UP THERE LET’S GO!!

    • gregorum
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I read your comment just before you deleted it, and it’s a real shame you did.

      We SHOULD educate people on proper financial management and responsibility long before they need it, long before people develop bad habits they struggle to break or fall back into— before their lives get ruined.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    102 years ago

    So not only are employees getting raped by 401Ks and HSAs but a 3rd time with this new Emergency Savings Account. Why the fuck dont they just pay us more?

      • HubertManne
        link
        fedilink
        72 years ago

        Honestly with the recent inflation they should not even collect taxes on the first 100k.

      • Dudewitbow
        link
        fedilink
        112 years ago

        You are aware there are several nations with higher taxes right? Its not a tax issue. Its a cost of other things thats a major issue. If low income people are still struggling after gettting their refund during tax prep, its not an income tax problem.

        Especially given that the article mentions miami, and florida is in like the bottom 5 in income taxes

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          A lot of people who pay $20-30k+ a year in taxes are also struggling.

          Mortgages have gone up, milk has gone up, eggs are too expensive, a lot of countries (like Canada, where I live) are increasing carbon taxes. Gas is already $1.70 a litre!

          Wages are one thing, but how many people can just swallow a mortgage payment that increase $500-$700 a month?

          I get it, you want to make more money, but something the government can actually do is let you keep more of the money you do actually earn.

          • Dudewitbow
            link
            fedilink
            7
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Are the people paying 20k-30k the people who cant afford the 500$ emergency spending though. Not saying there aren’t any (as someone might have a ridiculous amount of debt) but those making that much are way more likely to afford the 500$ emergency fund than the low income who almost pay no income tax in the first place (no federal, as thats returned in the form of a refund, and variable state based on state.)

            Changing icome tax doesnt adresss the majority of people who have the problem the post is about. Theres already like 8(?) States without income tax

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              You have to understand how expensive it is supporting a family right now. People are spending an insane amount of money on groceries alone. $1,000 - $1,800 a month

              The gas to get to work for a two income household could be upwards of $1,000 a month.

              Mortgage renewal? Hope you have an extra $700 a month laying around.

              Cad payments? Ya that’s going to add another $200-$300 a month in interest payments alone now.

              And forget it if you have kids. Daycare, physical activities, summer camp? Maybe another $12k per year depending on how many kids you have!

              The issue here is that the middle class are also being destroyed and without them there’s no money to even give to the government to help lower income people.

              In Canada, $150k a year for a family of 5 is low income now.

              At least lower income people get subsidized food and housing. Middle class? They get 20% interest on credit cards to keep afloat.

              This isn’t about wages, it’s about costs. All of them of which taxes are just one. A big one, but just one.

              You can attack the corpo’s later, right now the fight is with the government to get the money going out under control.

              You can get a 50% raise, but if you’re still spending 70% more to eat and have a roof over your head, it doesn’t really matter does it?

              If shit was more affordable, maybe $40k a year could be a livable wage again. Cause right now it’s not.

              • Flying Squid
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                12 years ago

                The gas to get to work for a two income household could be upwards of $1,000 a month.

                What are you driving, two Escalades?

              • Dudewitbow
                link
                fedilink
                32 years ago

                So your answer to fixing a problem is lowering imcome tax? A solution that doesnt even fix the problem for the target audience in the first place. Its nonsensical to completely ignore the likely largest group of people that need the help.

                The people who have debt in mortgages is based on what kind of home they bought. Its an opportunity cost on why they chose x home over what might have been the cheapest home they could have bought (not saying that there arent people who just buys the cheapest home possible in an area, but they arent likely the majoirty). The person who has a mortgage at least has a house, the people that cant afford the 500 month to month emergency fund likely has nothing.

                I wont even get to the point where its the people who have houses are the ones making it harder for more houses to get built because they want to maintain the value of their house at the cost of those who have not.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  12 years ago

                  So what I hear you saying is that families with homes should just lose their homes because funding the government is more important? And they should have thought of that before buying a home?

                  Are you a fucking idiot?

                  Let’s just make MORE poverty stricken people, the government comes before all! It sounds like you just want everyone to hand over their pay cheques to the government so they can decide who gets what and when they get it, so we can all be totally fucked.

                  This Lemmy crowd is filled with morons.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          42 years ago

          I’d like to know when “State and Federal taxes” worked 6 hours of my shift because I can’t remember.

          • Dudewitbow
            link
            fedilink
            22 years ago

            Sometimes it goes into things people dont care about, and other times it goes into things people take for granted.

            For example, if you took a road to work today, that road didnt pay for itself.

            • snooggums
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              And businesses used those roads to move goods, but only have to pay taxes on profits.

              • Flying Squid
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                12 years ago

                Your taxes also go to the fire department and the health department. I’d say most people think those are pretty necessary.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        Our taxes aren’t even that high. Look at what people used to pay up until the 80’s. We should go back to where we actually taxed millionaires and corporations instead of coming up with yet another tax haven account for them. Regular people can’t contribute to these things because they don’t have the disposable income. They are meant for the rich with some bullshit excuse to make us feel good.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I pay 30% of every dollar I make and I also pay another 18% or so every time I spend a dollar directly to the government.

          And the prices of EVERYTHING has Skyrocketed!

          When prices go up, the goods and services taxes you pay also go up. When prices go down, they go down too.

          Interest rates are killing people, prices are killing people, taxes on top of taxes are killing people

          • Chetzemoka
            link
            fedilink
            22 years ago

            Well, I like roads and bridges being fixed, and good reliable weather forecasts, and standardized weights and measures, and a functional department of justice, labor, food and drug safety, standardized phone and Internet protocols so companies can’t completely lock us in their walled gardens, cars that are safe to drive, etc. So I’m happy with the taxes part of that equation

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              That’s great, have a look at what those things should cost and then look at how the government is mismanaging their funding that we give them

              Why even bother with wages, just have the corporations pay the government directly for our work. The government can figure out how to distribute everything and fuck us all

              • Chetzemoka
                link
                fedilink
                12 years ago

                “Should” cost. Yeah I’m gonna need citations for that one. You really and honestly believe the libertarian nonsense that private, for-profit corporations are going to provide those same high quality services and fuck us less?

                And make no mistake, those are high quality services. Corporations are perfect happy to use all the free data generated by the National Weather Service, US Geological Survey, NIH, NSF, NIST, etc precisely because it’s world class. It’s funny how the only things that people complain about the “government” doing are all the things that cost corporations money like product and environmental safety. Or social services that are deliberately inefficient so conservatives can keep complaining about how bad “government services” are. It would be a lot more efficient if they would just give poor people fucking cash.

    • Nougat
      link
      fedilink
      142 years ago

      You do realize that 401k and HSA accounts are voluntary tax shelters for specific saving/spending purposes, right? Nobody is “getting raped” by these; they are a way for people to save a portion of their wages for a specific purpose without having to pay income tax on it (for HSA) or deferring its taxation until it’s withdrawn after retirement age (with 401k). And 401k plans are commonly matched by employers, meaning that you get money for free by saving some of yours.

      • BlinkerFluid
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Some companies have mandatory 401k deductions whether you request it or not.

        Ashley Furniture (sue me if you care)

        Granted, it is technically a 401k and accumulates but they don’t pay any towards it so I don’t give a fuck, give it to me so I can invest it myself.

        commonly matched by employers

        Funny… funny guy.

        • Nougat
          link
          fedilink
          92 years ago

          No, some companies are opt-out instead of opt-in, meaning that you will contribute to a 401k by default, but you always have the option to change your contribution to zero. And yes, employers commonly match 401k contributions.

          Even if they don’t, the tax benefits of using a 401k makes them outweigh any private retirement investments you would make, with the exception of a traditional IRA.

      • snooggums
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        They could just not tax the things that are eligible for HSA in the first place.

        They could do single payer so everyone gets coverage at a lower tax rate than they currently pay for insurance.

        They could fund social security based on a percentage of all income instead of having a cap around 100k.

        They could get rid of all the tax breaks for the wealthy so the tax burden wouldn’t need to be so hard on the median and lower income earners.

        HSA are putting the blame on the person for being sick and 401k exists to both pump some mo ey into the system to inflate stocks and to get the regular person to care about the stock market. Both are just there to screw over the public for the benefit of the wealthy so we don’t nationalize healthcare and properly fund social security.

  • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
    link
    fedilink
    82 years ago

    I’m very fortunate to finally be able to cover a major expense like that. Nothing like going to the hospital, but if I needed new tires I wouldn’t be completely broke.

    It’s a strange feeling.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    38
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    The first change made it so employees may save up to $2,500 in after-tax money in a separate account alongside their retirement accounts. Workers would potentially be automatically enrolled in the programs, which would defer the money automatically through payroll deductions.

    Read: banks lobby to get money automatically deposited into their specific accounts so they can generate interest from it the employees will never see, and make it more difficult for employees to actually get their money

  • Naja Kaouthia
    link
    fedilink
    412 years ago

    Me, looking at a $500 dentist bill for a crown because teeth are luxury bones: Yeah……fuck.

    • Flying Squid
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      My dad needed $20,000 worth of dental work. So they took a trip to Costa Rica for maybe $3k-5k and got the dental work done for free. Because Costa Rica gives free healthcare, including dental, to anyone in its borders. And they got a good vacation out of it.

      They could afford to do that though. Most people couldn’t.

      • Drusas
        link
        fedilink
        72 years ago

        Worse: I had a root canal done years ago. Then I found out, after the tooth broke, that the root canal was done incorrectly and the tooth needed to be removed. I had to pay for the root canal and to fix the tooth and to have it removed. Fucking dentists, man.

        • Flying Squid
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          I just had to pay a $50 copay to get a gastroenterologist to tell me he wasn’t concerned about my problems, it was because of my ulcer, and to add Mylanta to my medications in the mornings. He literally could have told me that over the phone. American healthcare is a racket.

  • Chetzemoka
    link
    fedilink
    192 years ago

    It’s also pretty hard when the corporations you work for aren’t interested in paying you what you’re worth. People need and deserve better wages

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      Your pay is only relevant to the cost of goods and services.

      People used to be rich earning $1,000 a year. Your pay is irrelevant, the costs of things is what’s more important.

      And taxes, fucking stop taking everyone’s money

      • Flying Squid
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        I personally liked paved roads and inspected meat and a fire department, but YMMV.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      232 years ago

      Corporations literally cannot pay you what you’re worth. The very nature of capitalism requires exploitation. For capitalism to function, there must be an inequity between a worker’s true value, i.e. their productive output, and their cost. The system is literally designed to fuck you over from the top down.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        62 years ago

        Ehhh, I’d argue the exact opposite. The people at the top hoarding so much wealth are arguably the worst capitalists. Capitalism demands cash flow, and the more the better. Few people hoarding and controlling so much of it is breaking it.

        I always love to point to healthcare. Between my portion and my employer my health insurance is over $15000 for my family. Yet I have a $5000 deductible still. Imagine if all that money that my employer is paying me I was actually getting. Then apply that to every family. But instead, a few companies make all the money off that. The problem is healthcare shouldn’t be a business, but a public service just like police, firefighters, roads, etc. In an emergency I’m not going to shop hospitals, and in non emergency I don’t have a choice anyway, my insurance company decides that.

        It’s the most broken system and everyone at the top is making too much money from it that it will never change until it gets so bad for the middle class it somehow starts bringing them down

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          52 years ago

          The people at the top are literally the best/winners at capitalism. They won the game, the game that’s designed to funnel capital

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          132 years ago

          This is such a weird take. You say the people at the top are the worst capitalists, but they literally succeeded the most at capitalism. You say capitalism demands cash flow, but… does it? Who or what demands that cash flow? Certainly not the free market.

          You then give a perfect example of capitalism failing, medical care.

          Why defend capitalism?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            I’m not defending it? I mean, I pointed out it’s issues and how the elites it strives to eliminate it has created. They won, they beat that system.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    292 years ago

    63% of employees are unable to cover a $500 emergency expense, according to a new survey from SecureSave, a provider of a financial technology platform to help employers provide emergency savings benefits.

    Well, they wouldn’t have any reason to lie about that, would they?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      122 years ago

      this would be very helpful during the times where the $500 emergency is the need for a pizza party