Liberal men on suicide watch
This is the best summary I could come up with:
The researcher, who asked to remain anonymous because he wanted to separate his professional life from the kink-related work he does, said he gained access to a database containing records of more than 10,000 users, thanks to two vulnerabilities.
He also reached out to the company on June 17 alerting them of the issues in an attempt to get them to fix the vulnerabilities and protect their users’ data, according to a screenshot of the email he sent and shared with TechCrunch.
[REDACTED] has left the site wide open, allowing any script kiddie to grab any and all customer information.
“Your cock is mine now,” the hacker told one of the victims, according to a researcher who discovered the hacking campaign at the time.
In 2016, researchers found a bug in a Bluetooth-powered “panty buster,” which allowed anyone to control the sex toy remotely over the internet.
In 2017, a smart sex toy maker agreed to settle a lawsuit filed by two women who alleged the company spied on them by collecting and recording “highly intimate and sensitive data” of its users.
The original article contains 702 words, the summary contains 182 words. Saved 74%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
No, no, no, no. No. Surely the hacker knows the victim probably did not see that comment as a threat 😭
Sign up for the cage, get a bonus dom!
Some things just shouldn’t be connected to the internet.
Unfortunately connecting this kink to the internet facilitates doing it. Having the device itself connect for ease of use had caused an unbelievable amount of tech issues, though. To be fair the programmer is a dipshit, though.
SomeMOST things just shouldn’t be connected to the internet.FTFY
SomeMOSTthings just shouldn’tbe connected to the internet.IFTTT
SomeMOSTthings just shouldn’t beconnectedtotheinternet.SomeMOSTthingsjustshouldn’tbeconnectedtotheinternet.Checks out. All suffering is caused by being.
deleted by creator
Apparently I’m one of those things. Jesus, what an article
But that just makes connecting those things to the internet forbidden… and therefore alluring.
…provides the most complete remote sex solution for the Internet and corporate intranet.
Lol ha ha
A piece of internet history. So glad it’s been preserved.
???
The researcher, who asked to remain anonymous because he wanted to separate his professional life from the kink-related work he does, said he gained access to a database containing records of more than 10,000 users,
10,000 users‽
he wanted to separate his professional life from the kink-related work he does
Don’t mix your pen testing with your pen testing if you know what I mean.
Rule 34 extends to action as well as observance.
yup :3
This exact scenario has appeared in an entirely unsurprising number of chastity stories.
Isn’t this just facilitating their humiliation kink? I think it’s more of a service.
That would be non-consensual.
Probably in the EULA
removed by mod
I feel like like the potential for being exposed as a chastity cage user might actually be a plus for some users
That thumbnail is A+
So is the headline. Chastity cage, exposed. 🤣
God i hope the users used a email alias and fake names
good, cause they where stupid enough to buy a fucking smart chastity cage
Can imagine buying this if you’re in an long distance relationship and into chastity.
The company is the bad guy here, there’s no need to victim blame just because their kink doesn’t match yours.
Having a unique use case doesn’t mean it’s still not an incredibly stupid product. Same as with smart door locks, smart safes, smart guns and smart “full self driving” cars.
im not saying the company isnt to blame, all im saying is a smart chastity belt is about the same level as a a smart shoe
A lot of kink relationships are long-distance. This sort of product appeals to someone in a kinky LDR.
I don’t know, if that’s the kink, that’s the kink. It’s not harming anyone who didn’t consent to it, so why kink shame them when they’re the ones who have been wronged?
literally never said anything about their kink did i. Their kink doesnt matter, them buying a needlessly “smart” smartdevice does
But the ability to control the chastity belt over the internet is part of the kink. That was my point.
Oh, well, I apologize for accidentally making it appear that i kinkshamed them
I will however not retract calling them dumb
Imagine having your smart cock cage locked out by Amazon because some rando told them you are racist lmao
We live in the weirdest timeline
Better than having it locked on I suppose…
And to think I don’t even feel safe about buying something as innocent as a smart TV…
Why oh why can one no longer buy a dumb TV?! Do companies just not make them anymore?!
If this is the same one I remember from a couple years back, what’s not listed in this article: two different security teams warned them of the vulnerabilities multiple times, the vendor claimed to have fixed the issue when they hadn’t, the devices didn’t have any sort of physical bypass in case of malfunction, and what finally convinced the pen testers to go public was the company announcing that they planned to make a locking inflatable butt plug using the same platform.
At some point the security vulnerabilities are a feature, not a bug. Butt plug ransomware is the latest sex toy fad.
It’s a new story, and the article doesn’t reveal the company… but… we all know which one it is.
Your cock is mine now
I’m dying
That probably worked for most of the clientele.
