The article is AdGuard centric but it sheds light on the whole process where Google suddenly decided to ban ad blockers.

  • TheProtagonist
    link
    fedilink
    72 years ago

    That’s no surprise to me. Ads are Google’s core business. Why should they support technologies that potentially limit their profits?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      AdAway is the best choice if you’re rooted.

      Some banking apps might break, but the DNS request log will help you debug and put the necessary domains on a whitelist. Or you can just google it.

        • Dawn
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I use it not rooted, on both an android tablet and phone. Haven’t run into any issues, it uses a VPN to block the ads

          Edit: there was one issue where youtube wouldn’t update the watch history, to fix this just allow s.youtube.com on the allow list

  • 52fighters
    link
    fedilink
    82 years ago

    Blokada on Android is the best. Get it from the website, though, not Google Play. Even though it is there, the website version is better.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        62 years ago

        I’ve been using Mullvad for 2 years and only just now realized I could turns ads off on my phone with a literal click of a button.

    • Hot Saucerman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      Pi-Hole + VPN. Connect to the VPN via the phone, having all the data that hits your phone passing through your Pi-Hole first.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      52 years ago

      Look forward to the replies on this one.

      On my desktop, I haven’t seen an ad in ages, they really piss me off. But on my phone I just seem to suffer through them.

      At home I really should set up a pi hole I guess. But that doesn’t solve it when out and about.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        Install PiVPN on the same Pi running Pi-hole and you can use your Pi-hole anywhere you go (plus you can also access any device on your home LAN).

      • strawberry
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        ive got ublock on ff for web, then instander on IG which is the only app I use with ads

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        Was using DNS66 and switched to Rethink DNS. At home I just run Infoblox with RPZ feeds to block ads.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      Netguard has network filtering as a paid feature. It has a pretty steep learning curve, but very full featured.

      • merde alors
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        € 0.10 or more

        yes, it’s “paid” 👉 10 cents

        if you read the faq once, you have all your responses. It’s not fair to call it a steep learning curve

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      I’ve been using Dns66 since 2017. I tried blokada (from GitHub) and didn’t like it. Haven’t tried others, so I’m also curious what other folks are using.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    F_Droid InviZible Pro also blocks, among others, ads (DNScrypt Proxie, I2P and TOR network), also in Google Play, but there only the “descaffeinate” version.

    Vivaldi browser has an inbuild and customizable ad- and trackerblocker.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    312 years ago

    Because google is an ad company… they are literally trying to make chrome where its not possible to block ads.

    • i’m sorry but i have to be pedantic here. it’s not how you get your revenue it’s the good or service you provide.

      magazines are not ad companies. TV channels are not ad companies. the source of your revenue does not make you a company in a sector of that source.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        62 years ago

        All of googles products except cloud exist to either sell customer data to companies to advertise to or they direct you to websites who pay.

        They are an ad data company. Search is a means to deliver ads. Chrome, mail, docs, etc were all there for ecosystem lock in… for what money? Customer data. For ads. Google+? User base. For ads.

        Youtube doesnt make them shit except for advertising. Youtube premium isnt selling which is why they are getting aggressive with it.

        Google is an advertising company and secondarily , a cloud provider.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        182 years ago

        Google literally considers itself an ad company. They have a huge framework meant to profit off of ads shown on other products and platforms. They sell data as a service to better target consumers for advertisement. It’s not comparable to a tv channel.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        102 years ago

        Yeah but Google biggest services are mostly free. The main source of income, although they have improved that by offering other paid services all these years, has been ad revenue on their free services.

    • Gamey
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      DNS blocking isn’t proper ad blocking but it’s certainly better than nothing!

        • Gamey
          link
          fedilink
          42 years ago

          Well, not about the DNS blocking, that’s absolutely great but it can only block on a domain basis so ads from the same domain aka first party ads (E.g. Youtube ads) can’t be blocked using it.

  • Reversed Cookie
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    So far ik, Apps which blocks Google Ads in other apps aren’t allowed, thats why DDG’s Tracking Protection blocks everything except Google Ads.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    6
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    It’s about selling your data to third parties so they can sell you sh@t and also about preventing you blocking ads playing in video content they provide or are associated with, it’s 100% to do with making money and ad blockers lower their income, for that reason they’d rather ad blockers not exist nor third party alternatives to their streaming services that do not carry the ads they’re trying to block those apps continuously.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    312 years ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    At the time, there were a number of apps on Google Play that offered content filtering functionality, such as AdAway, AdFree, Ad Blocker, and AdBlock Plus.

    In 2016, Google tweaked its developer policy to clarify what actions are prohibited, and for the first time directly named ad blockers as a target.

    After AdGuard for Android, which filters traffic for all apps on your device, could no longer be distributed through the Google Play Store, we had to find another way to reach our users and provide them with updates.

    The increased visibility this store provides would allow us to introduce the app to more people who can block ad-based tracking, thereby protecting their privacy.

    The reality is that most casual users install apps exclusively from the Google Play Store, and that means they are currently missing out on a chance to protect themselves from trackers and ads.

    We hope that Google will change its stance and give people the choice and tools to protect themselves from pervasive tracking technology and invasive advertising.


    The original article contains 1,019 words, the summary contains 172 words. Saved 83%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!