• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 years ago

    Give me a European style apartment with high ceilings and generous space and you have yourselves a deal!

    That said, I’ve been working in my local building industry for almost 20 years and the trend that I see is that though there are more apartments being built, the quality has tanked. We have huge issues with mould, flammable facades, exploding glass, alternatives are rampant through the roof and price gouging.

    Unfortunately this has fed the idea that apartment living is no good.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    172 years ago

    I hate living in an apartment. I’d probably kill myself if that was the only living option for long enough.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 years ago

    Option C, some selfish dipshit would rather have one building in the spot for the apartment that houses his 2 kids, wife, and himself and that’s it

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      Exactly. People who advocate for densification are basically advocating for everywhere to be Amsterdam or NYC with continuous human habitation and maybe small concessions in the form of city parks (a joke compared to real natural areas, IMO).

      I’m not sure if they’re aware that this will be the logical conclusion of those policies.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        I’d rather have a few cities and a lot of unspoilt nature than no cities and no nature, just suburban sprawl everywhere

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      292 years ago

      Well if that much housing is needed then the idea of not providing it is kind of… monstrous? evil?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Nah mate, there should be laws to how much people can live in some area. It’s inhumane to compress so many people in one place. I don’t want every city to be Hong Kong.

    • HidingCat
      link
      fedilink
      112 years ago

      Sadly, that’s more likely to happen. I like apartments more than houses, but it’s not just about building apartments alone.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    212 years ago

    In this image I can’t help but notice how much infrastructure cost there is here. Consider need for water treatment pipes run to and from each house for water and sewage as well as sewage treatment infrastructure. Keep in mind that failure rate increases with each house and by length of these runs that you are adding and fire hydrants being added every so many feet, shut off valves. Don’t forget that we now have significantly bigger demand for water as we now have a lot more vegetation to manage and a higher reliance on emergency services as we are spread out over a larger area so we now have to increase ems, fire, and police spending. Then you add the costs for electrical infrastructure with your sub stations and transformers and all the costs set to maintain that especially since these are underground lines apparently and ofcourse we have increased risk of failure again per service and foot run and higher demand on those services which will require more workers which turns into money being spent outside of the community. You then add the cost of data lines and phone lines including the costs associated with maintaining and upgrading those which are also apparently underground which means your upgrades may be significantly more expensive and will take much longer to deploy. Now that we have all these houses separated we will now have a population that will be more dependent on vehicles so now we have to factor in all of our road maintenance costs and our public services will not require far more vehicles as well which means we will also need mechanics to repair and maintain these vehicles. Now with roads alone when we consider the costs involved things get rather expensive quickly. Cost to maintain roads, even roads that are seldom used, is surprisingly expensive and require a lot of workers to build and maintain as well as vehicles, machinery, and land to store, recycle, and create materials needed to repair and build the roads. On top of that there is also an often missed statistic of vehicles which is public safety as they are a leading cause for injury which is another stressor on our little community.

    This is far from all the possibly missed costs of our suburban/rural neighborhood but I feel these are some of the important ones people live to overlook.

  • jecxjo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22 years ago

    I own a townhome that i rent out. Have had good tenants for the most part but don’t want to deal with the HOA anymore. So we want to sell but sadly the next door neighbor smokes in her unit so much that it smells in our unit.

    In this state there is absolutely nothing we can do legally about the problem. The guy across the street destroyed the grassy area in front of his unit and a lean was placed on his unit until it was fixed or he was evicted in 90 days. But actual damage to our unit we were SOL.

    This is why people don’t want shared units. When your neighbor is an asshole you’re usually screwed.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    372 years ago

    This is a pretty terrible way to make this point. The pic on the left is neater and the one on the right leaves almost no space for the people living there to do anything. You probably want a little bit of cleared land for literally anything to do on the island.

    Then again, there isn’t a dock. So I figure the island on the right has a better way of building boats to leave.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    82 years ago

    Yeah, try living in an impoverished town, where it’s the housing on the right, spread out like the housing on the left. There are, like, no jobs (none that are actually sustainable long-term for living in this economy), but they just leveled a huge area of forest for more low-income housing (AKA Projects)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112 years ago

    I’d rather live in my own few acres of forest with a creek running through it and a big house.

  • stevedidWHAT
    link
    fedilink
    English
    232 years ago

    I mean is the building owned by its tenants or one entity/person who gets to own the building and a large amount of peoples homes thusly?

  • TheBlue22
    link
    fedilink
    English
    422 years ago

    I live in an apartment. I want to live in a house.

    Cunt upstairs neighbour smoking cancer sticks on the balcony, making my room smell like shit when he does it, dumbass neighbour to my right who phones some other dumbass at 6 in the morning, screaming into his phone, waking me up. No garden, can’t have a cat or a dog.

    I don’t want to live in a suburb where I am forced to use a car, but you can live in a house and still be able to get anywhere you want without a car.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    132 years ago

    Build a co-op garden around the apartment and you’ve got yourself a deal.

    Everyone in the place gets X amount of space. More then 60% of people won’t garden at all and their share can be maintained by the gardeners.

    Fruit trees and berry bushes will be grown for all to use.