• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      62 years ago

      No. Elon Musk is American. It’s just called being a dick. I dunno, maybe there is a better word, but Treason is not the word.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          92 years ago

          It’s complicated.

          He was born in South Africa, but he holds citizenship in the US & Canada as well. He went to Canada because he couldn’t get access to the US, but his mother was a Canadian national so he was able to convince her to get them Canadian passports to attend school in Canada and then transfer to the US. So after a couple years at Queens Uni he transferred to Upenn. Then after completing his Bachelors, in order to stay in the US he pretended he was going to get his PhD, but then started a company sort of like online yellow pages called Zip2. His investors realized that as a student couldn’t work, they needed to get him a green card. So they got him a an “investor green card” (Eb-5) and 5 years later he became a naturalized US citizen.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        232 years ago

        You got down voted but you’re absolutely right. We, as a collective society, have allowed billionaires and those with obscene amounts of money to operate above the law. We’re seeing it play out over and over through different actions of the rich, and those that get charged usually get lighter sentences or are not convicted. It’s honestly a large scale problem that is not being addressed.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          Cut off their funding. Billionaires don’t earn legit money, they harvest it off the money printer and give it to themselves and all their friends.

          Don’t allow these nazis to keep issuing themselves new currency and then forcing everyone else to trade with it in order to sustain their lifestyles.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      27
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I don’t think what he did was illegal per se, but he is definitely positioning himself against US geopolitical interests, which is a really bad idea if you are a US citizen, living in the United States. If he were to give away any military secrets that pass through star link, which I’m sure Russia will inevitably ask him to do, he will get arrested for espionage. He should tread very carefully.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    If you own a new Tesla purchased since he took over Twitter, I suspect you may start having some increased tire and paint bills. I could see it becoming a trend; feels like the kind of thing kids could get into.

    • Joker
      link
      fedilink
      92 years ago

      Fuck that. We don’t need some Tesla version of that Kia challenge shit. I happen to drive a Tesla that I bought when Elon was still cool. I would never buy another thing from him (for a variety of reasons, many of them related to the car), but I’m still stuck with what I have because it’s a bad financial decision for me to change the car now. He already has my money and it pisses me off every day. The last thing I need is some anarchist, vigilante twat slashing my tires to “teach me a lesson”. Go fuck up Elon’s shit instead of taking it out on people who just might feel the same way about him as you do.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Elon’s shit is untouchable to the kids. New Teslas are not.

        You use his charging network?

        • Joker
          link
          fedilink
          42 years ago

          So maybe don’t do it at all instead of taking it out on people who didn’t do anything wrong?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            I’m not promoting it. Just wonder if Musk is getting dangerously close to becoming a generational bête noire, and his enablers with him.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      Agreed I read the title as something you’d see a villain nonchalantly do in a comic book/movie series.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      27
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Net neutrality is about not favoring (or disfavoring) one type of traffic over another. Turning off the internet entirely doesn’t fit that definition. If he had specifically blocked traffic from the Ukrainian drones, that would be a net neutrality violation. It’s still bad for other reasons though.

      • jard
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        That’s fair, and the article doesn’t explain exactly how Elon was able to “cut off connectivity” to the drones, but regardless I think his own stance on how Starlink should be used can be reasonably interpreted as him favoring one form of traffic (‘Netflix and chill’, ‘online school’, ‘good peaceful things’) over another (‘war’, ‘drone strikes’).

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          I don’t know if this is the same, but it’s been previously acknowledged that they shut off service at the contested borders.

          So Russia says they own this region now, all starlink would be down there.

          Not sure if that’s still the case

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        82 years ago

        Hm, I don’t think I’d agree. He chose to block this specific traffic. Even if he did it by turning off the internet in the region.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          As far as I know Ukraine doesn’t have any net neutrality regulations. Since net neutrality is per country then I think it’s sort of a moot point. I also think you’d have a hard time arguing that pulling the plug violates net neutrality. You’re effectively treating all traffic the same in that there is no more traffic. I do think it would be interesting to see how that would play out though.

          Aside from that Ukraine would have to go after Musk for it. Which seems like a really bad idea if you want to remain in favor with the increasingly unstable power broker that controls the infrastructure you need.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              I for sure agree that it goes against the spirit of Net Neutrality. I also think it would be interesting to hear what a court would say. I don’t think you’re outright wrong or anything. I just think it’s sitting on the knifes edge. The fact that Ukraine doesn’t have net neutrality means we’ll never really know (At least I hope something like this doesn’t happen again in our lifetimes or ever!)

              And yeah, I certainly think the Ukrainian people have every right to want to see keel hauled for this, but I also don’t think they have the luxury of makinng enemies at the current juncture. Musk is a giant piece of shit for cutting Star Link during a critical operation. He’s a giant piece of shit for a lot of other reasons too, but this one kind of takes a giant piece of the shit cake…

              I just think Ukraine is in a very tough spot with him. Even more awkward given that he’s a single crackpot that has shown to be ready and willing to throw a monkey wrench in their operations because he felt like it.

  • Heresy_generator
    link
    fedilink
    163
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    “How am I in this war?” Musk asks Isaacson. “Starlink was not meant to be involved in wars. It was so people can watch Netflix and chill and get online for school and do good peaceful things, not drone strikes.”

    Musk, transparent as ever, makes sure to tell his biographer that it’s about peace, man, and has nothing to do with his love of authoritarian regimes.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      192 years ago

      Once the killers have done all the killing they want, peace becomes paramount. Once they’ve stolen everything they can steal, then theft becomes a crime. A man with a gun kicks in your door, starts eating the food from your fridge and fucks your wife. He’s doing good peaceful things and if you resist you’re a warmonger.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      162 years ago

      Maybe if he had any actual knowledge instead of just buying shit and slapping his name on it, he would know that the Internet was originally DARPAnet and was designed for expressly military purposes prior to being co-opted by capitalists.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        112 years ago

        He’s just making sure that his personal brand is associated with sexytimes, as per his naming of the Tesla models.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      252 years ago

      Didn’t his company supply a bunch of Starlinks because of the war? Was he expecting Ukranians needed to watch more Netflix and do more school stuff while getting bombed out by the Ruzzians? What a crock

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        Yeah, that was when he expected Russia to win easily. Probably figured he’d get a little bit of good PR, then Russia wins and then he could say “I tried to help, but I guess it just didn’t work out for Ukraine.” Just didn’t go the way he expected I guess.

        That and I don’t think he was quite so far down the fascist rabbit hole back then.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    I mean, it’s his company, nothing secret about it.

    Other than that - a loitering munition requiring internet connectivity on approach to target sounds awfully stupid.

    And, of course, he provided that connectivity by his own initiative with his own idea as to how it should be used in the first place.

    Being given a certain kind of gift many times doesn’t mean you become entitled to it.

    Musk considers Russian presence in most of Ukraine aggression he wants to help foil, but a significant Ukrainian counteroffensive something he doesn’t want to help. If you accept his choice in the former, you should accept it in the latter.

    Or maybe not steal fucking billions of funding intended exactly for that counteroffensive to not rely on one billionaire’s ideas of cool. Maybe Ukraine should do something about that pervasive corruption first, then blame Musk. With that amount of funding they should have been able to simply overwhelm Russia FFS.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1202 years ago

    Musk was reportedly motivated to foil the attack out of concern that a strike on Crimea would constitute a “mini-Pearl Harbor” and lead to Russia retaliating with nuclear weapons

    So glad the blue-checks get to dictate our foreign policy now.

    What was all that DoD money for? A suggestion box?

    • BarqsHasBite
      link
      fedilink
      462 years ago

      Not like Russia invading Ukraine was a mini pearl harbor, nooooooo not that.