• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      162 years ago

      A VPN doesn’t really protect you from Google though. They get their data through trackers, which doesn’t get blocked by a VPN. Obviously I’d still not use a Google VPN, because who knows what they’d do with that data

          • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘
            link
            fedilink
            English
            82 years ago

            All the traffic is now attributed to you, like it was before your self hosted VPN.

            • L'unico Dee
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              That’s a fact. But, in the first place, VPNs weren’t invented for privacy.

              • L'unico Dee
                link
                fedilink
                12 years ago

                It also depens on what informations the host has about you. Bare minimum is the IP, but it isn’t really an identification

                • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  If you’re hosting a VPN in your house, all traffic is going to/from your device and your home encrypted, and your home and the isp unencrypted. Since it’s in your home, everything you do on the VPN tunnel can be seen on the other side by your isp.

                  E: autocorrect corrections

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      9
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Idk… maybe not great for privacy but I just test it (I have been a subscriber for a while and didn’t know there was a VPN) and it bypasses my country blocks of certain piracy pages so so far it’s kind of usefull.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Just be careful with that. If Google is logging your sessions, then your country’s government can request that data. The idea that Google wouldn’t keep logs is laughable.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Sure, I don’t care in my case tough. It’s not illegal to access them even tough they are blocked.

  • sadreality
    link
    fedilink
    322 years ago

    They really do think we are all fucking idiots, don’t they?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      102 years ago

      Not really free, it’s bundled with paid Google one. Not saying it’s good, just not even free

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    322 years ago

    That would be like hiring professional bank robbers with a long string of hits to provide security for a bank.

    • Prethoryn Overmind
      link
      fedilink
      62 years ago

      Aren’t some of the more profitable and secure services created by those trained to break security?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Well, Google continues to have the profit motivation of selling people’s personal data, whilst the way black hats turn into white hats is that they can make more money (or at least safer) by helping to improve security rather than break it.

        You don’t really hire an active black hat to do penetration testing into your system when they can make way more money selling what they’ll find in your system than what you’re paying them for said penetration testing.

        The problem is that Google’s core business is still built-around using (and selling, though indirectly) people’s private data.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      142 years ago

      Not trusting big Goog at all here, but some of the best hackers have been known to get hired by big corporations or the government, seeing as how they’re the best at what to look for.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        Bruh, you have a cybersec violation on your rep sheet and you couldn’t get a job sweeping gravel off a cybersec company’s parking lot.

        “Cool cyber hacker gets hired by glowie boys” happens only in movies. The risk just isn’t worth it. In the very rare cases where the skill is worth the risk, which it never is, rest assured there is a handler team authorised to break both hands, the second the hacker goes off script.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        In this situation Google controls the whole setup and is not under any oversight from the customers (i.e. those using the VPN).

        In that example of yours they would be a still active hacker whose prime source of income is hacking and who makes way more money from hacking than from said gigs for the “big corporations or the government” and who isn’t at all being directly whatched by their employers to make sure they don’t abuse the situation.

        Would you give a know active black hat a gig doing penetration testing, which they can do from their own place using whatever they want with no oversight and were the possible profit they can make selling what they find in your systems vastly outweighs what you’re paying them?