• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      432 years ago

      These people are rich, but they’re not the wealthy. These are your doctor types, not your billionaires. Doctors are paid well for sure, but they should be paid well.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        Idk, I would not go with “I am a doctor so I deserve money with which I can live a live that seems so unhinged to the median income earner that I not only can allow to have a big car with which probably only one human at a time is driving, no, I also have a plane whith which probably only me is flaying at once and I have access to my own airfield”. They would still be on my menu right after the billionaires

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          62 years ago

          That depends on the doctor. Not all are paid the same. Plastic surgeons get paid huge dollars for a lot of frivolous work. I’m with you there. But a brain surgeon or a heart surgeon… They deserve the big bucks. I don’t care at all that they can afford a German car and a small general aviation plane. I care more about the working class not being able to afford a decent new car and the billionaire that has to decide which super car to drive that day.

      • icedterminal
        link
        fedilink
        English
        122 years ago

        A lot of people hear or read “plane” and assume like a million dollars. You can quite literally buy a single prop piston engine small plane for less than $100k USD. Yearly cost to maintain can be as little as a few thousand if flights hours are low.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          But, that’s $100k for a hobby.

          Like, you’re almost certainly not using that plane to commute. You may use it instead of buying a commercial plane ticket when you go on vacation somewhere, but that’s not saving you any money, it’s likely costing you significantly more in storage fees, etc.

          People who own planes aren’t billionaire-rich necessarily, but they’re still people who can afford hobbies that cost $100k.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            The aircraft hold their value, and actually appreciate. The actual cost is about $10k a year. Lots of people spend far more than that on other hobbies.

            Over half of all pilots in the US (200k) hold a commercial pilot certificate and use flying as their sole source of income or as a way to supplement their income. Commercial pilots makes $50k a year until they can become airline pilots which have salaries starting at $100k.

          • icedterminal
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            Of course they’re not using it to commute daily. You even pointed out in your first sentence: It’s a hobby.

            Someone else in this thread also mentions that many small aircraft have multiple “owners” who share it. Just like timeshare vacation property. Everyone who is part in it, shares the cost of maintenance. This makes it even cheaper. This counters your statement of:

            that’s not saving you any money, it’s likely costing you significantly more in storage fees, etc.

            It can in fact be cheaper going this route.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              32 years ago

              People who live in a community where you can store your airplane in a garage and then commute from your garage to the runway aren’t going to partially own a plane. What would be the point in having that kind of a property but not being able to use it because you only got to see your plane one week per month?

              Not every private pilot has a $100k hobby, but anybody who buys a house with a taxiway going up to it almost certainly owns their own plane, and their hobby is not cheap.

              • icedterminal
                link
                fedilink
                English
                22 years ago

                People who live in a community where you can store your airplane in a garage and then commute from your garage to the runway aren’t going to partially own a plane.

                That’s where you’d be wrong. Many are shared. Just because one of the owners lives beside the runway doesn’t mean it’s solely theirs. I’m not the only one to say this. https://lemmy.world/comment/3346098

                What would be the point in having that kind of a property but not being able to use it because you only got to see your plane one week per month?

                Save money first and foremost. It’s a win-win situation for all parties involved. And one week per month is a lot of time. You don’t know what the arrangement is for those involved. The time share could be wildly different depending on each pilots desires.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          122 years ago

          You can get a Cessna 172 or even some nice Mooneys for around $50k. Unlike cars, even really old ones are kept in good running order because parts time out and have to be regularly maintained. Even if you want to buy a newer plane, a lot of people in GA use fractional ownership. That $200k newish Cirrus SR22 is fairly likely owned by 4 people splitting the bill. GA isn’t cheap by any measure, but it also isn’t exclusively for the wealthy. Upper middle class can get into it without too much issue. The people we should be raising everyone to, not tearing down.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          Also, many of those planes are timeshared. Most of the people I know in those places share a plane with several other people or have small kit planes they built.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      232 years ago

      My wife’s grandparents used to live in a sky park like that. Right before the birth of my second child I was laid off and my wife was doing her student teaching. Suddenly in a rough situation with no income. Her grandparents came to visit for Christmas and their way of commiserating with us was to say, “I know how it is; we just had to sell our second airplane…” No irony, not joking. They honestly felt that losing one of their airplanes was equitable to losing a job with 2 babies in the house. It’s ok though, I came out on top. I have a job now and they’re both dead.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          I have a model of an F-14 I made as a kid, Microsoft flight sim and a 15 year old flight stick. Does that count? Full disclosure, the F-14 is missing a vertical stabilizer now.

      • Captain Aggravated
        link
        fedilink
        102 years ago

        A private (meaning, non-public) field like this one probably uses the multicom frequency, but yes. Self-announce on the CTAF. Irks me a bit there aren’t runway numbers.

          • Captain Aggravated
            link
            fedilink
            32 years ago

            A runway with two ends. And you’d probably be surprised how easy it is to choose one end when you mean another.

            Also to identify it from the air as a runway. It’s paved and they painted a centerline; I would have also painted numbers and thresholds.

          • ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃
            link
            fedilink
            62 years ago

            Gives you a rough magnetic heading so you can line up easier and keep your pattern straight. Also to tell others which way you’re going to keep from crashing head-on (a north/south strip might be 36/18, for example, so ppl know which way you’re going).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        132 years ago

        unicom

        First thing I thought of reading on this tiny screen: 🦄

        We need a community for keming.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          No, you read it right, UNICOM

          Or UNIversal COMmunications

          Also known as CTAF, or

          Common Traffic Advisory Frequency.

          Basically the frequency you use when you’re in uncontrolled airspace.

  • Ian@Cambio
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1102 years ago

    Little known fact. Airplanes still use leaded fuel. I’ll bet that the blood levels for all of these families are elevated. Not a great place to raise a kid.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      182 years ago

      Yep, and the FAA is taking it’s sweet time to approve a new unleaded fuel for general aviation that shows a lot of promise called G100UL. It’s estimated it could take another 6-9 years. Otherwise it’s currently only approved for specific planes and not available at most airports and aerodromes.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        It’s approved as of last fall, but the FAA spent well over a decade stonewalling it with unnecessary bureaucracy.

        Now we’re left with the chicken-and-egg problem of the market, where nobody will offer unleaded because it’s more expensive, but it’s expensive because it’s not widely used. The feds should subsidize it down to $4/gal for 5 years to get it off the ground.

    • Marxism-FennekinismOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      732 years ago

      Clarification: Only piston aircraft require leaded fuel. Which is unfortunately a pretty big part of the general aviation market, but similarly sized turboprops do also exist (though are more expensive) and it doesn’t apply to modern commercial aviation at all.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        512 years ago

        Further clarification: Only gasoline powered aircraft without the Auto Fuel STC require leaded fuel.

        Although, there is an initiative underway to fully phase out leaded avgas. G100UL is the FAA approved formulation. Exciting time and long overdue.

  • edric
    link
    fedilink
    English
    202 years ago

    That’s a lot leaded fuel to be inhaling everyday.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    82 years ago

    Half a million per house isn’t really that bad considering it’s on an airport and you get a hangar

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    32 years ago

    I guess it works as a pilot neighborhood but Rich people would never want to live in such an obvious place. Makes them too easy to eat.

  • Raze157
    link
    fedilink
    32 years ago

    Hoskins Field in Washington is like this, but more trees and turf.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        62 years ago

        Are you sure? I’ve seen a video about this community, but I don’t think it was Tom Scott. Couldn’t find it on his channel.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          52 years ago

          Wow, I’m actually pretty sure I’m wrong on this. I’m just now checking on my lunch break but I can’t find it. I know I saw a video about this (or a very similar) community following specifically one man who has a hanger house. Swore it was Tom Scott but, I just can’t find it… Don’t tell me I hallucinated it lol

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          82 years ago

          [INTRO]

          Tom Scott (with his characteristic enthusiasm): “Hello, lovely internet denizens! Today, we find ourselves in a comment thread, delightfully jesting about my propensity to dive into the oddest corners of knowledge. From the physics of shoelaces to the mysteries of quantum buttered toast, we’ve covered it all!”

          [SMILE AND NOD]

          Tom Scott: “Now, I can already predict a few of the replies that might pop up here. ‘Tom, why not delve into the intricacies of a potato chip next?’ Well, who knows, that might just be on the horizon! And yes, someone will undoubtedly ask about the physics of a cat’s purr. It’s been on the list for a while, folks!”

          [CONFIDENT NOD]

          Tom Scott: “But you know what they say, the quest for knowledge knows no bounds! So, let’s keep the laughter rolling and the curiosity burning. What’s next, you ask? Well, that’s anyone’s guess! Stay tuned, stay curious, and let’s keep this adventure going!”

          [OUTRO]

          Tom Scott (looking bemusedly at his busily buzzing phone): “Well, it seems the replies are pouring in already! I might be here for a while trying to keep up with all your brilliant comments. But hey, that’s the joy of it, isn’t it? The learning never stops! Keep those questions and suggestions coming, and I’ll do my best to tackle them in the videos to come.”

          [TOM SCOTT SMILES AT THE CAMERA]

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              22 years ago

              [Hard cut to specialist]

              [Overlay with a Scandinavian name and the title, “Expert in online discussions”]

              “Mange tror at internetdiskussioner er sunde. Det er et indtryk vi har arbejdet mange år på at kultivere så vi kan påvirke folks meninger uden at blive opdaget i det. Vi fik blandt andet Tom til at lave denne video blot for at få mig med i den!”

              [Cut back to Tom]

        • @[email protected]
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          72 years ago

          Very true, even the 99% global human population reduction of 2025 he’s already recorded and got ready to go

  • yukichigai
    link
    fedilink
    32 years ago

    We actually have one of these in Dayton, Nevada. Half hour away from Carson City, hour from Reno, not much to speak of at all in the town really (other than some historical interests) but there’s an entire subdivision with a golf course and a small airfield and “hangar homes”.