Another reason to never listen to anything recommended by spotify

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 years ago

    Ah, yet another reason to never use their home page. YouTube music seems to be the only decent recommendation engine these days

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    172 years ago

    If it’s anything like any other social media site that that let’s you pay to promote, they will do it once…

    And then half ass it a second time…

    Then they just tell you they are, but you won’t see any more people listening to it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    542 years ago

    deeply deeply twisted company

    they think of music simply as ‘content’. cynical, disgusting.

    • Deceptichum
      link
      fedilink
      352 years ago

      Yeah it’s unfair.

      The music industry is famous for being run on love and passion, and not advertising manufactured hits.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      252 years ago

      Uh, music is content. Some music has more heart than others, but I wouldn’t say that Target is disgusting because they sell cheap prints and wall art.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        232 years ago

        They use 320 ogg for Premium’s Very High Quality, which is awesome, arguably audiophile quality and near indiscernable compared to FLAC (lossless). Ogg is much better / more compact than mp3 so you can expect much better quality at the same bitrate. It is 96 kbps ogg for Normal Quality, and 160 ogg for High Quality, both accessible in the Free tier. I am a musician of twenty years with good ears and sound equipment, years of experience listening to FLAC and converting to mp3 vs ogg at various bitrates to test, I think they’re doing a great job on this front.

        https://support.spotify.com/us/article/audio-quality/

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 years ago

      Streaming services was supposed to recommend stuffs based on listening or watching habbits not who pay the most

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      162 years ago

      People get mad that Steam shows them games. It’s like loading up Netflix, seeing the list of movies, and yelling “look at all of these ads”!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    92 years ago

    Never used Spotify. I have my own methods of finding new music and once I have something I want to listen to I usually just type “[artist] [album] full album” on YouTube and if it’s not there (which is very rare) it’s usually on Bandcamp or SoundCloud. I do pay artists though, I buy their music if I enjoy it and always make sure to see them if they are in town, I think it’s healthier than a subscription service model.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 years ago

    I’m so glad I stopped updating the app, I am lucky to still have the recently played at the top of my home page and then daily mixes right below it, I have to scroll to see the nonsense

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 years ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Spotify this week launched a new tool called Showcase that allows artists to promote their work directly in the streaming app’s revamped Home feed introduced earlier this year.

    The new feature was announced earlier this year at Spotify’s Stream On event in LA, alongside a range of other growth and discovery tools for artists, like the full-screen recommendations known as “Marquee” and a new “Discovery Mode” tool that allows artists and their teams to identify songs they want prioritized on the streaming service.

    The company says that Showcase is opening up to artists and their teams with U.S.-based billing with 1,000 or more monthly streams in the last 28 days in at least one of the target markets.

    By default, Spotify says it will show the campaign to those who are likely to stream the release — a broad audience.

    “While playlist pitching is an opportunity for artists to find new audiences and Marquee helps them make a splash for their new releases, today there are more moments than ever where promotion can drive impact.

    Showcase gives them the ability to do just that: now artists can amplify a new release, give their catalog an encore, turn viral buzz into long-term fandom, and more – right at the moments that matter most and on the most visited place on Spotify: Home,” she added.


    The original article contains 487 words, the summary contains 223 words. Saved 54%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 years ago

    I never understood the love for Spotify. It’s always felt so much more commercial to me. I’ve had a pandora acct for about 10 years now and I love it. Ad-free is awesome and I can just skip over the artist spotlights and sponsored stuff.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    162 years ago

    Do folks reminiscing of the good old days of physical media not remember how much label promotion media was packed with media? I have records where the sleeve is basically an order catalog for other artists on the label. I don’t see Spotify promoting albums on a discover feed to really be that much different than the marketing old except adopted for a digital interface and streaming economic structure.

  • tim
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112 years ago

    Wtf im a paying costumer &@#)!!!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    132 years ago

    Another reason to just use local player. Just buy physical albums and rip them, buy the actual digital files (from eg Bandcamp) or if you can’t afford it right now, I’m sure you can find the files floating around the internet. Just make sure to buy the physical album when you can afford it.

    Artists will receive far more support from buying their music this way rather than through Spotify which pays artists very little and the algorithm is against mid and small size creators.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      Yes, stresming service music players are trash compared to local music players. I use musicolet as a player that have the cool feature of switching between playlist without losing tje position of the latest player songs

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      What local players do you use? I haven’t found a good one on Windows so I just use the default (formerly Groove Music).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        I like Audacious. The UI does not look modern but that’s not something I care about. It has every feature I need, it’s lightweight and does not have any telemetry.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I’m still using an older version of Winamp. It supports pretty much every audio format ever, visualizations, and has an excellent media library format. There is a new Winamp, but I haven’t tried it.

        I also use VLC, which supports fewer formats, but supports all the major ones out of the box and is open source and under active development.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      I wouldn’t have found like half the music I listen to now if I was only buying releases I already knew about.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 years ago

      You’ll also get higher quality files. Spotify can’t play CD quality music. Apple and Tidal make a massive deal about being able to play “high quality audio”, but it’s a lot less impressive when you find out they really just meant CD quality, which had been around for almost 30 years. A real 24 bit flac takes longer to download than to play. Real high quality audio will never be streamed.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        “A real 24bit flac takes longer to download than play” if you have dialup maybe. I don’t think you can even legally call it “broadband” if your internet is slower than a flac bitrate

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Downloads depend on the server as well as the client. I can say for certain that I’ve never been able to download a 24 bit flac album in less than 30 minutes, usually over an hour.