All these (ad)ons always take priority over performance.

  • Synapse
    link
    fedilink
    English
    642 years ago

    Great, I can’t wait for Whatsapp to be the only way to reach customer support and make payments. I always felt the confused look of people when I tell them I don’t have Whatsapp wasn’t enough.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 years ago

      always felt the confused look of people when I tell them I don’t have Whatsapp wasn’t enough.

      the worst part is that most people cannot fathom that you don’t have Whatsapp and you want to continue not having. The confused look is because their way of thinking is “ok you don’t have, so what, open an account, it’s taking 10 seconds”.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        When contractors try to get me to communicate with them on what’s appropriate, I am happy to tell them that it’s forbidden on company devices.

        Typically that conversation started on email, which they don’t want to continue using for reasons they usually can’t explain well.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 years ago

    it really depends.

    If it’s different parts of the same system I really don’t like if it gets split up to multiple apps. Take steam, there I need two apps, one for the general store and it’s functions and one for communicating with my friends. In that case I’d rather would have one app that fits all.

    But if I don’t need several functions of an app and they are also hurting the experience with it, I’d rather would have the sourced out to other apps.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    102 years ago

    This is far more likely to become the Do Everything App for the Western World than X/Twitter is.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      I’m really interested how this is going to play out. I’m seeing this from a European perspective - Meta has show many times, that they shit on the GDPR. And while it seemed, that nothing really happened so far, that authorities are getting traction. Fines are racking up. The Digital Services Act and the Digital Markets Act are going to introduce more regulations, and I think that the future might hold even more surprises for Meta, especially if they succeed in build all these new things into WhatsApp.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112 years ago

    I was recently in Brazil and it amazes me how the country adopted the platform. You can do everything in it. And it’s not that you’re always talking to someone on the other side. It’s all automated. Remember those gigantic labyrinths of menus you had to listen when calling a business? Now it’s all in WhatsApp, but with the advantage of being much faster to read. I asked for a service in a company, they gave me a protocol number. When I wanted to check on it, I just had to type the number on WhatsApp and it would tell me if it was ready. So, no need to develop GUI, sites, and so on. Everything is accessible through WhatsApp.

    So, I understand why Meta rolled this out and started with Brazil.

    In the end, it feels like we made full circle and we’re coming back to the Telnet era of doing business.

    • Fontasia
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      *except nearly the entirety of India, but who cares about a country with nearly a billion customers

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    262 years ago

    During the peak of Whatsapp Controversy, I had 50 out 450+ contacts on Signal. Now it is just 5 people.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        172 years ago

        This is US defaultism. People doesn’t care about sms capabilities outside the US. The US isn’t a huge market for Signal.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          102 years ago

          I think it did effect things. SMS is weirdly popular in the US (i think it’s might be cause they didn’t use it much in the 90s?) but people I know in France and UK still use texts for some things, even if messaging apps are where most of communication happens (French people even use mms which is insane).

          I know that I managed to convince a number of tech-shy people (including parents) to get Signal by telling them replaced their sms app, so it wasn’t a whole extra app / network they needed to use. It was great for me because I could ditch WhatsApp completely. But when signal stopped supporting sms they went back to just whatsapping and texting, so I cracked and reinstalled WhatsApp to keep in touch with them.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          I only use SMS for some communication because the only other form of communication my phone can do is calls. But I have to be careful with that because they’re paid and not unlimited.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      Mostly because of the 400+ who remained on WhatsApp, the 45 of 50 decided to move back and the 5 probably are running both apps

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        True. They stick to WhatsApp as all th convo goes there and it laziness to switch over, copy data and all .

        Srsly I hope people will start installing Signal once again.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    92 years ago

    pls whatsapp stop copying from fucking telegram there should be a law to make it not possible this is killing competition

    • adr1an
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      But ‘Stories’ are from IG, owned by Meta… so… we rather stay quiet on this occasion xdd

      • voxel
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        tg stories failed miserably due to being premium only tho

        • Yetanaika
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          But I can use them just fine? Some customization options like expiration time are behind premium but it’s available for everyone.

          I think it was premium only for a short while before version 10

          • voxel
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            …you still can’t publish stories without premium. I’ve only seen like one two stories so far (despite having hundreds of contacts and chats), and one of them is a telegram ad. Almost everyone gets surprised when they see the stories bubble at the top…

            • Saulot
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              you can publish them (at least on iphone) without premium

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        first they copied it from snapchat (meta loves to copy from smaller alternatives to kill them) second they added it only people where continuing to ask them for it (me too)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        Stories are the worst addition to Telegram. I hope Meta sue them and make them remove this feature :D

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      Do you think 99% of the grannies and non-techies care? I support Signal and use it myself to communicate (with the 2-3 other people that use it…), but it’s not comparable with WhatsApp or Telegram which everyone has. It’s shitty but it’s reality. People even use Facebook Messenger over Signal.

      Threema at 6€ is not really a good option for anyone anymore, a least not over Signal. Also they had an encryption obfuscation problem recently, read the longer comments at the bottom here and decide for yourself:

      https://reddit.com/r/privacy/s/edgSH00aCu

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        I know people who prefer Threema simply because they know what their revenue model is. Everyday I find that another person in my contacts has joined Signal. I don’t communicate with too many grannies besides my own two, both of whom have Signal installed on their phones ftr. My circle clearly isn’t your circle.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      292 years ago

      If only people cared. Sadly, they don’t.

      Source: am one of probably three people in the country that refuse to use Meta CRAPWARE. And thus, very lonely.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Some folk do. I’ve managed to convince at least 10 of my friends and family to install Signal and/or Threema.

        • Dariusmiles2123
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          Me too and we’re very happy with it.

          Even my employer is making us only use Threema work.

        • HidingCat
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          It’s not just friends; I cannot do my work in my past three jobs without WhatsApp, because that’s how ingrained it is. And they were varied jobs too.

          Client interactions? WhatsApp
          External stakeholders? WhatsApp
          Public enquiries? WhatsApp

          No WhatsApp, no job, no income. That’s how ingrained it is.

    • Veloxization
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      What I did was say I’m deleting my WhatsApp account in [insert sensible time] and if anyone wants to contact me, to use Signal. Lost contact to some, but many followed.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    202 years ago

    Good. Keep cluttering the app until people move to simpler alternatives. Preferably libre.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 years ago

    This is kind of funny. Some of these features I would see see as Google’s turf. However, since Google can’t create a text messaging service, Meta can use their messaging app to encroach.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    142 years ago

    At the company’s global Conversations event in Mumbai, WhatsApp introduced an in-app shopping feature for merchants and customers. Dubbed ”Flows,” […]

    That name sounds more like a feminine hygiene product than a shopping platform.