“Nobody uses water,” one man in a Dodgers cap said in Spanish when Maria Cabrera approached, holding flyers about silicosis, an incurable and suffocating disease that has devastated dozens of workers across the state and killed men who have barely reached middle age.

The disease dates back centuries, but researchers say the booming popularity of countertops made of engineered stone, which has much higher concentrations of silica than many kinds of natural stone, has driven a new epidemic of an accelerated form of the suffocating illness. As the dangerous dust builds up and scars the lungs, the disease can leave workers short of breath, weakened and ultimately suffering from lung failure.

“You can get a transplant,” Cabrera told the man in Spanish, “but it won’t last.”

In California, it has begun to debilitate young workers, largely Latino immigrants who cut and polish slabs of engineered stone. Instead of cropping up in people in their 60s or 70s after decades of exposure, it is now afflicting men in their 20s, 30s or 40s, said Dr. Jane Fazio, a pulmonary critical care physician who became alarmed by cases she saw at Olive View-UCLA Medical Center. Some California patients have died in their 30s.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2162 years ago

    There are a lot of workers in different industries that are at risk of silicosis and don’t know it. The mentality of “it’s just dust, don’t be afraid to get a little dirty” will end up killing people.

    • airportline
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 years ago

      My boss has emphysema and asthma, but refuses to wear a mask when doing demolition because “it makes it too hard to breath.” I don’t understand this mentality.

      • I don’t know an outdoor construction worker that doesn’t have some sort of pulmonary disease. Chronic rhinitis at best, mostly COPD, many with also with sleep apnea. And those that smoke on dusty job sites will all die young.

    • VenoraTheBarbarian
      link
      fedilink
      1412 years ago

      You’re absolutely right, all this old timer “Kids these days are so soft…” B. S. When in reality the young just don’t wanna die or be maimed at 30.

      Take care of your bodies, kids, it’s the only one you get. Don’t let corporations run you into the ground and then throw you in the trash. We need to demand better working conditions from our bosses and our elected officials.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        82 years ago

        I try to point out to my coworkers that part of what they’re trading for wages is wear and tear on their bodies. Using provided PPE is like getting a raise because you’re giving the company less.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        242 years ago

        “The only one looking out for #1 is you.” - My section chief when I was in the Army.

        I’ll never forget it and I pass it on every chance I get. I’ve gone as far as shaming some people into wearing knee braces and the like because “what the fuck are you doing, you’re gonna fuck it up even worse”

        I try anyways… doesn’t always work…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          42 years ago

          When running a fireworks show, safety is by far the most important part of the job.

          In the safety briefing before we start working in the morning, the one before we load shells, AND the one before we fire the show we remind them that the person most responsible for their safety is themselves. If they do not feel safe about something, anything, do not do it and come to me. I will never shame someone for wearing PPE. I will always be inspired from whatever device or tool they come up with to make the job safer or more comfortable.

          Everything can wait while we sort out safety issues.

          • This reminded me of a guy I knew. He was the safety guy for large events such as concerts or conventions, lots of electrical work and heavy loads, hoisting and such. Said this stuff to others, but also tried to put it all on himself, sort of like you, “always come to me.” Dude made sure he was there for every important or possibly dangerous step, sometimes not very busy but then when a big event was coming up, very very busy for a few weeks. Fell asleep at the wheel. Gotta delegate.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              It’s not so much of a “I’ll do it.” It’s a “get me and we’ll find a way to do it safe.”

              If I have to get more PPE, if we need to change our layout, if we need to cancel parts of the show, we’ll do what we need to to make it safe.

        • VenoraTheBarbarian
          link
          fedilink
          92 years ago

          Keep up the good work, it might not always work, but the times that it does are priceless.

          There are a decent amount of teenagers where I work and I try to pass that idea on to as many as I can. Adults too, of course, but it’s really satisfying to be able to catch people while they’re young and still have loads of time to protect themselves… From a lot of things.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    192 years ago

    to debilitate young workers, largely Latino immigrants

    in an industry where immigrant workers typically labor in small shops and are often paid in cash

    made their rounds at the parking lot of the Home Depot in San Fernando, where laborers in long-sleeve shirts waited for people to drive up and offer them work.

    In the effort to be politically correct and not say “illegal immigrants”, they prevent the reader from knowing the true extent of the problem.

    When an employer is willing to break employment laws related to immigration, they may also be more likely to break other laws, like workplace safety laws. When the employees are illegal immigrants, they’re not as able to complain to authorities when their employers are breaking safety laws.

    If these workers were actual legal immigrants, they could blow the whistle on their employers. If they were unionized their union could shut down the business until their bosses took their safety seriously. But, because they’re illegal immigrants an unethical employer can treat them as disposable – and, pretty much by definition, anybody who is hiring illegal immigrants is an unethical employer.

    The people affected here are largely stone workers. Stone workers used to be extremely powerful. The Freemason fraternal organization started as stone workers who held the secrets of the profession, supervised stoneworker qualifications, controlled their interactions with clients, regulated their interactions with the state, etc. Now, because of the widespread acceptance of illegal immigration, not only are stoneworkers not powerful, they’re disposable.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      72 years ago

      You make a good point about how workers have been played against each other to the disadvantage of all. However, there is a lot of area between illegal immigrants and full citizens who are comfortable bringing their employers to court. Many legal immigrants spend years in situations where being fired or quitting would mean having to leave the country. Depending on what they’d be going back to or what family and life they have built here in the meantime, they may be less free to rock the boat even if they felt confident in the legal system. Even citizens would be unlikely to take a stand without the support of some larger group.

  • JokeDeity
    link
    fedilink
    42 years ago

    Most of the guys I know in any form of manual labor jobs are the kind of guys that would rather die than wear a mask to protect themselves or others from anything, so this not even slightly surprising to see.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    432 years ago

    I absolutely love the enthusiasm for required regulations in this thread but everyone is missing one critical aspect… illegal workers are probably a huge part of those impacted by this. Many of these “companies” who cut counters work through subcontractors and I bet the majority of these are just a guy with an LLC. I would love to see more numbers on the type of worker/businesses being hit with this illness.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Ah yes because it’s the worker’s responsibility to ensure that they are aware of all safety issues and health hazards and all safety equipment first, exists period, and second, works perfectly at all times.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        It’s actually an OSHA violation if the employers don’t make the workers aware of all that. All hazards have to be clearly communicated to the workers. If they don’t know the safety issues and necessary safety equipment, the employer fucked up. There’s practically no way for the worker to ever be at fault here unless they are willfully disobeying the employer to do something they know is unsafe.

        Even then you could argue the employer should’ve known better than to hire them lmao

  • Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    252 years ago

    We hear about machines replacing jobs all the time. Why can’t they replace cutting fucking countertops so people don’t die in their fucking 20s?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      This isn’t happening in factories. This is happening in situations where someone is remodeling so none of those guys can afford fancy machinery. They usually cut/fit/sand on site.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    22
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Oh dear God I remember being warned about this in a chem lab because we were using some silica.

    Dust/particulates are always bad for the lungs. I don’t think there’s any exception. Masks with a fitness test need to be provided and specified as PPE for this kind of work, at the very least. The company is unlikely to do so themselves unless legally pressured to.

    Edit from my double comment: employers are required to provide functioning, proper PPE to employees per OSHA, and also train them on properly using it. If masks and water hoses aren’t already considered required, we need to make sure that gets updated. Force the companies to comply or be sued.

    I very recently watched a safety module thing about this for work actually as part of the training requirement.

  • tcrichard
    link
    fedilink
    162 years ago

    I’ve been to a place that does this. Everything was covered in water. It prevents any dust getting in the air. The slab and blades have water spraying over it. I don’t think a mask was even necessary. But without water I assume it would be awful.

  • roguetrick
    link
    fedilink
    792 years ago

    The fucked up part of this is how preventable it is. Very few folks will take to wearing a mask though, when that’s all they need.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      462 years ago

      False, read the article?

      Its more than just masks that are needed and the article makes that very clear.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          29
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          They weren’t exactly rude and it is irritating when people comment on things in the article incorrectly.

          Also it’s not just respirators that are needed.

          Plus they are essentially blaming the workers claiming they won’t wear masks.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          28
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          You get “serious creep vibes” from someone saying “false read the article”? Christ what world do you live in

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          42 years ago

          No, respirator is a type of mask, thats not what I was referring to.

          The article mentions multiple times that masks are just one piece of the puzzle, and goes into a fair bit of detail about how its way more than that, that is needed.

          Read the article, it’s gone over in detail multiple times.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        Right, it’s the ventilation hose built into every piece of cutting equipment ever made that they neglected to use.

    • Balios
      link
      fedilink
      582 years ago

      Here’s the full set of measures recommended:

      Workplace safety regulators have recommended a suite of measures including water spraying systems, ventilation and vacuum systems to clear dust, in addition to protective respirators for workers — ones covering the entire face if silica levels in the air are high.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      322 years ago

      Considering these are likely illegal immigrants working on these countertops, I wouldn’t be shocked if their employers refused to supply masks.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1362 years ago

    The answer here is simple- regulations with teeth.

    Every saw uses water. Every worker wears a mask. Random inspections.

    Inspector sees one person without a mask? $1000 fine. One machine with no water hooked up? $5000 fine. 10 people with no masks and 3 machines with no water hooked up? $25,000 fine. Make it clear that there is no fucking around here.

    Job site like described in the article? Shut down until problems fixed.

    • I’d further add personally liability of all supervisors, managers and executives. You run such an operation and cannot prove without a doubt that you instructed for safety, provided the necessary tools and materials and did regulary inspections yourself? You pay for everyones treatment and damages.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        242 years ago

        Personal liability (piercing the corporate shield) is a really tough nut to crack. That’d also do some outsized harm- think kids college fund raided for settlement money.
        That said, I’d be happy to make it a personal crime to, with knowledge of the law, instruct any worker to use a machine without safety equipment and water hookup, or to work without a mask. THAT should be a personal crime, like criminal charges. And you should have to, when hired for any such supervisory position, sign a one-piece thing that has that law laid out so you can’t claim you didn’t know the law.

        • This is well reasoned.

          All injuries arising out of employment should fall under workers’ comp., except if the injury is caused intentionally.

          Even recklessness, I think, it best suited for workers’ comp. I would make workers’ comp. benefits more robust.

          I would support criminal liability for wanton or reckless conduct by coworkers.

          Unlike with asbestos, the companies that mine and make the raw countertops have clearly labeled their products and warned of the risks of silicosis.

        • In my country (Germany) as an architect or civil engineer you can be held liable, in some cases also as an employee, when deliberately or grossly negligently violating technical rules.

          At the end of the day no college fund is more important than peoples lifes, but there exist liability insurance specific to certain jobs. It is similiar to doctors malpractice insurance. Expanding the concept to site supervisors seems reasonable to me.

          And of course that must not except the company from liability. It should mainly take effect, when the companies liability cannot cover anymore.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            62 years ago

            Engineering and architecture are different. It’s our job to make sure the things we design bring no harm to people and we have specialized training allowing us to take that responsibility on.

            Site supervisors are often tradespeople, and may not even have the authority to direct health and safety measures on their site if corporate sees otherwise. I agree, they have a responsibility to do so, but it must be started from the top with some coercion by strong regulation. Putting liability personally on supervisors just removes it from the company who likely made the decision to forego supplying water because of cost savings.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Site supervisors… may not even have the authority to direct health and safety measures on their site if corporate sees otherwise.

              So what? That’d change real quick if site supervisors became personally liable.

              Well, either that, or “corporate” would suddenly be unable to find anybody willing to do the job and go out of business. It’s a win either way!

              Putting liability personally on supervisors just removes it from the company

              It’s not an either-or. Put the supervisor in prison for a year; put the company execs in prison for 10. There’s plenty of criminal liability to go around!

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            That’s the key- deliberate or grossly negligent. If a supervisor, through deliberate choice or inexcusable gross negligence, instructs an employee to work in an unsafe manner, I have no problem making that a criminal offense that makes both the company and the supervisor liable.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        92 years ago

        As a manager of blue collar workers that actually gives a shit about my teams this is the answer unfortunately. Many managers don’t care but will if they’re personally liable.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        Set up a monitored tip line where supervisors can tell the govt that management isn’t giving them the proper PPE to protect their workers. That way if management isn’t giving them PPE, supervisors have a place to go turn to instead of being squeezed from both ends. Get an OSHA inspector out on a surprise trip and get upper management fined.

        Supervisors need to care about their direct reports first and foremost, over any company demands. One of the best supervisors I’ve ever had gave me therapist recommendations when I mentioned having a tough time with mental health, and she told me she sometimes took personal days for her own mental health. Another supervisor, when I was going through an even more rough period of mental health, told me that his wife had bipolar and they put a lot of time and effort in, together, for her to feel alright.

        I felt like I had those guys in my corner, and I knew that if push came to shove, they’d have my back. They may have ultimately been powerless to internal HR policies, but they reaffirmed to me that my health should be my top priority and I needed to put it first.

        That’s what it means to have a workplace as a family. The leader truly cares about everyone on the team and has their back.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      232 years ago

      I think each violation should carry a heftier fine than the last, so each worker without a mask would be a 25% nominal increase.

      1 without? $1000 2 without? $1000 + $1250 3 without? $1000 + $1250 + $1562.50 10 without? You’re looking at a $42,566.13 fine

      You have to have escalations, otherwise violating the regulations becomes a business expense, not a punishment.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        I agree very much. I think on the low end fines should go down to be survivable for a small business, and we don’t need to fine a big company $100k because someone took their mask off.
        But fines should increase steeply by number of offenses, and multiply if management is willfully refusing to provide a safe working environment (IE doesn’t want to pay to have a machine hooked up to water/drain, doesn’t want to pay to have filters cleaned, doesn’t want to pay for masks / goggles / other PPE, etc).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        Well, in this case I’d say split the difference and make it each incident escalates where an incident #1 = “we caught you, we told you”, incident #2 = “we told you yesterday to fix your shit / don’t do it again, 2x fine” rinse repeat. Otherwise you run the risk of bankrupting a small business that had all 10 of their workers in violation, and maybe even not making a dent in a large business that only had 1 out of 1000 workers caught in violation

        In addition to per-incident escalation, what I could get on board with are scaled fines based on contract / business size. The first incident is still “survivable” for small businesses but will actually have teeth for those larger ones. And then of course if they keep violating, say bye-bye economic viability.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 years ago

      gonna need higher fines than that. Its not some rinky dinky small outfits that are handling fancy counter tops like that.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    392 years ago

    I did construction very briefly (“briefly” because the company owner quit paying me after a while); companies cut corners every possible place they can, because any safety measures cost time or productivity. Even doing things properly costs time and money that they don’t want to spend. Construction is competitive, so they’re bidding as low as possible, and promising unrealistic delivery times, and then turning around and expecting their workers to make those deadlines and costs.

    You can’t fix this without stringent oversight, and criminal prosecution for the owners that are refusing to give workers the correct tools, and follow safety protocols.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    442 years ago

    I worked for a few spray-foam insulation companies in my early 20’s. I’m just waiting to hear the same thing from spray foam. Half the guys I worked with didn’t wear masks most of the time and were just covered in foam all day breathing in the off gassing of fire retardents and blowing agents and other nasty chemicals. I quit because I saw the writing on the wall and my boss hated me for quitting before training my replacement. I told him it wasn’t worth my health.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      The EPA/OSHA cut hexavalent chromium exposure limits by 100. Aircraft workers have been spraying, painting and airbrushing that shit for fucking ever. It’s uniquely good at its task (anti-corrosion) so there’s no making it go away any time soon.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Nah he was my boss and I was a decent sprayer, and a very very good helper. So to make fun of me wouldn’t have worked well for him. He understood my concerns. My other coworkers were not like that though, like someone in a comment above me said. They’d all crack jokes at me because I took safety very seriously. I would like to see how they are all doing now and I wonder about their health sometimes. I didn’t keep in touch with any of them though and live far away now.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      322 years ago

      The dumbest thing is the mentality between workers sometimes. “Don’t be a pussy” some will say when you ask for masks/goggles/ear plugs/etc but none of them will be there when you eventually get injured or sick. None of them will congratulate you, hand you a tough-guy-trophy and pay your medical bills + pension.