- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
That somehow seems pretty optimistic.
Sure, there aren’t any heat adapted mammals
Doesn’t matter if there’s no food or extremely scarce resources.
Why would that be though? Last time there was a supercontinent it also supported large animals
Losing the plankton in the ocean on top of losing vegetation would also cause oxygen problems, iirc.
One of the planet’s mass extinction events was The Great Oxidation Event. Future lizard scientists will study our time period and coin it The Great Carbonisation Event!
The extinction in the article has nothing to do with carbon
deleted by creator
That fucking website with its 3 quarter screen popup forcing registration. Fuck new York times and it’s bullshitty bullshit.
Switch to Firefox and bypass that shit
I’m on FF but on mobile. What Is the magic setting??
Add-ons and filters
Ublock origin Ghostery
nytimes.com##+js(json-prune, data.user.messageSelection.input)
Wo-oh, livin on a prayer
Wo-oh, livin on a prayer
Make way for dinosaurs round 2.
Electric Bugaloo
Crocodiles and sharks just be watching mammals and birds like old tradesmen watching the new apprentice, knowing he aint gonna last a day.
So do I have to go to work today or not?
Professor Farnsworth: “Good news, everybody!”
Sorry, but it’s “Good news everyone”.
HUMP DAY
In the geological timescale for the supercontinent to reform, we and mammals would have evolved as well. Humans would evolve into Xenu™©® for all we know.
This is the problem with believing too much in models. A model can show you anything you want - it’s output is only as good as the parameters and algorithms you set it.
Modelling the climate in the next 50-100 years is already extremely difficult and fraught with inaccuracies but we have lots of models and data to extrapolate from, so we do have a crude idea where we’re going. But we can’t model next years weather with accuracy, just the base trend. Crucially important warning for climate change but limited otherwise.
Modelling out to 250 million years is basically a crock of shit. The tectonic movements are predictable and gross predictions that a pangea arrangement might be warmer may have some validity but modelling the climate and evolution and status of mammals is pure conjecture.
Good thing about modelling that far is you will never have see you model’s accuracy being tested. Publish a paper, play into current fears around climate change with an irrelevant prediction about 250million years away, get an article published in the New York times and egos massaged all round.
If at that point we’re not off earth yet we kinda had it coming.
We’re not supposed to leave Earth. We evolved to survive and interact with Earth’s systems. Death is inevitable. Entropy is our God.
Please! We can’t predict the weather for tomorrow with enough certainty and you want me to believe that we know how it will behave for the next 250 million years?!
I, for one, welcome our new insect overlords.
deleted by creator
ourselves included
Um, we are talking 100’s of mlllion years, yes?
I guess someone isn’t in the beta testing for neuralink 😏
Okay, maybe graphen + light circuits will have infinite cycles of operation and be fine with passive cooling…
And there’s experiments with surface-only electron waves tech (what’s it’s name?), which could work on the potential difference of wind blowing over it.