• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    It’s essentially a map of big countries (population, territory, population density…)

    This map would be way more interesting if it was normalized per capita or some other meaningful denominator. Only then does it make sense to point fingers.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      UK has a higher population than Canada but had a lower rating on this scale. So that’s not strictly true.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        Not to mention India and China vs. the US

        Total emissions would tell a different story but population is not the only factor here

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          A few of the dimwits I work with use china alot as a reason to not do anything about climate change because they keep building coal plants but… The coal plants they build are more efficient.

          According to this chart the UK is doing well but we can still do better and we should keep doing more.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      China and India have 5 times the population of the USA, and yet are 1 order of magnitude or more below the USA. You’re not making sense here

    • Ben Matthews
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      It’s about future oil and gas expansion (FOGE), what matters to the atmosphere is the total - identifying potential threat. Effectively multiplying FOGE by area (as shown) doesn’t make sense, but neither does FOGE per capita (as most is exported, not consumed locally). I’d suggest just a sized blob for each country - then can show some other dimension with the color.