downpunxx to Lemmy [email protected] • 1 year agogotdamnfedia.ioimagemessage-square206fedilinkarrow-up11.26Kcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up11.26Kimagegotdamnfedia.iodownpunxx to Lemmy [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square206fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareEleventhHourlinkfedilink3•1 year agoWater can’t be wet. Wetness is a property that water gives to something else.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•1 year agoid argue its the same as saying fire isnt hot, just whatever fire touches becomes hot
minus-squareEleventhHourlinkfedilink2•edit-21 year agoAnd you would be wrong. That is called the Association fallacy and false equivalence fallacy. Fire is not a liquid.
minus-squareEleventhHourlinkfedilink2•1 year agoHence the fallacies. Also, fire doesn’t have to touch anything it order to heat— unlike liquids.
thats because water is already wet 😂
Water can’t be wet. Wetness is a property that water gives to something else.
like water
Not at all
id argue its the same as saying fire isnt hot, just whatever fire touches becomes hot
And you would be wrong. That is called the Association fallacy and false equivalence fallacy.
Fire is not a liquid.
i didnt say it was a liquid
Hence the fallacies.
Also, fire doesn’t have to touch anything it order to heat— unlike liquids.
liquids which are…wet