@[email protected]M to Murdered by [email protected] • 11 months agogotdamnfedia.ioimagemessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up1613cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1613imagegotdamnfedia.io@[email protected]M to Murdered by [email protected] • 11 months agomessage-square32fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish10•11 months agoThey just ended the debate on if water is wet lol
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink18•11 months agoI wouldn’t say so, and for the same reason they claim water isnt wet i claim water is wet: unless it’s just a single molecule, water touches (and even clings to) water. So water is wet.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•11 months ago What if you have two molecules of H2O that are below 0°C or above 100°C? What if you have two molecules of some other liquid substance that are also polar like H2O?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•11 months agoI’d say that the liquid phase is implied. Nobody is arguing whether a solid is wet. And this is just by feel, but I’d say yes. Wetness is polar liquids sticking to stuff.
They just ended the debate on if water is wet lol
Zoolander did that 23 years ago lol
I wouldn’t say so, and for the same reason they claim water isnt wet i claim water is wet: unless it’s just a single molecule, water touches (and even clings to) water. So water is wet.
I’d say that the liquid phase is implied. Nobody is arguing whether a solid is wet.
And this is just by feel, but I’d say yes. Wetness is polar liquids sticking to stuff.