@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 year agoCursed wretched marketingmander.xyzimagemessage-square154fedilinkarrow-up1993
arrow-up1993imageCursed wretched marketingmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square154fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoYou disputed that right here: It’s not accurate to say we were all looking at the same image with the dress. Why would you bring this up if not because of my comment?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-21 year agoI’m saying I didn’t dispute the optical illusions/visual fuckery occurring. That’s not incompatible with the other contributing factors I listed. Does that make sense?
You disputed that right here:
Why would you bring this up if not because of my comment?
I’m saying I didn’t dispute the optical illusions/visual fuckery occurring. That’s not incompatible with the other contributing factors I listed. Does that make sense?