The Spanish government has a plan to prevent kids from watching porn online: Meet the porn passport.

Officially (and drily) called the Digital Wallet Beta (Cartera Digital Beta), the app Madrid unveiled on Monday would allow internet platforms to check whether a prospective smut-watcher is over 18. Porn-viewers will be asked to use the app to verify their age. Once verified, they’ll receive 30 generated “porn credits” with a one-month validity granting them access to adult content. Enthusiasts will be able to request extra credits.

You have to request more porn credits from the government if you need more? Don’t want the government to be tracking this data of you. This is a privacy issue

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      231 year ago

      How can you be against porn? It’s neither good or bad, it exists and I basically don’t watch it, but I recognize that others do, why is that a problem that needs solving? To be clear, I’m reading your response as against porn in all forms and for all audiences based on your wording, is that what you mean?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          I paid rent using a webcam years ago, and I am not sure that your points really apply to all porn/sex-work. I am not denying that it doesn’t apply to some of it though.

          Men paid me to chat with them, let them watch me jerk off, and sometimes watch them watch me jerk off. I was probably going to jerk off anyway, and knowing what I was so attractive that people would pay me to see me do it was a turn on.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Yet, you only streamed because you needed to pay rent, or didn’t you?

              It’s pretty fun to having guys go on and on about how big/suckable your dick is and how much they want you to fuck them. If I was single I’d probably do it again, even without being paid.

              Also, I did not propose immediately anything that would threaten the activity in the way you practiced it

              When you responded to @[email protected], you said that you were against all porn.

              To be clear, I’m reading your response as against porn in all forms and for all audiences based on your wording, is that what you mean?

              Yes.

              I was showing one of the many examples of being in the sex industry, without any abuse and without it being “paid rape” as you put it. You didn’t say “some”, “a lot”, or even “most”. You simply generalized all sex work as harmful to the worker/performer.

              My problem with pornography is the reality of it as well as the reality of prostitution in general. The porn industry is the home of abuse, in every sense. First in the rawest sense, the physical and mental abuse that actresses go through; second in the reproduction and propagation of the culture of abuse, considering that it is the most recurrent theme in porn films; third in the economic sense, pornography, like prostitution in general, is the sale of consent: the actress or prostitute receives money to have sex with someone she would not have sex with under other circumstances, in short: paid rape.

              • Raphaël A. Costeau
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                When you responded to @[email protected], you said that you were against all porn.

                Yes, and I also didn’t suggest banning pornography or anything like that. If you think that my statement alone that I am against pornography threatens pornography as a whole, you are greatly overestimating my influence.

                You simply generalized all sex work as harmful to the worker/performer.

                It is a convention, at least as I understand it, that when we are talking colloquially about a phenomenon, we are talking about how that phenomenon generally happens, even if we don’t use the word “generally” or something equivalent, since it is common sense that for everything there is at least one exception. If you feel like your case doesn’t fit into any of the issues I’ve outlined, with all honesty in my heart: good for you. However, most cases are not that lucky. Exception, instead of contradicting the rule, proves it, otherwise, it would not be an exception, it would be the rule itself.

        • Chaotic Entropy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          It seems pretty clear that advocates for and against porn/prostitution should all want it to be legalised and regulated so that proper controls and oversight can be put in place. Driving porn/prostitution in to the hands of criminal enterprise guarantees that there is no safety or standard of behaviour when it comes to these industries, much like the failing war on drugs.

            • Chaotic Entropy
              link
              fedilink
              English
              4
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Okay, well tell Portugal that then, considering the dramatic social shift after decriminalising and treating drug addiction as a health issue.

              Obviously don’t do it like America, because that’s the same rule with most things.

                • Chaotic Entropy
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  51 year ago

                  Sounds like we agree then, you did say that there is no point in legalising it. If that was the combined concept of both legalising it and giving it to corps to handle being bad, then sure, we agree.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        They’re probably against the exploitation associated with it. I’d compare it to being against diamonds due to the bloody conflicts associated with them.