ThomasMuentzner [he/him, comrade/them] to [email protected]English • 1 year agoTrump shot ?x.commessage-square369fedilinkarrow-up1188cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1188external-linkTrump shot ?x.comThomasMuentzner [he/him, comrade/them] to [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square369fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareRedDawn [he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish3•1 year agoYour reasoning seems pretty backwards, “there’s no evidence he did it, so he probably did” is what your comment reads like.
minus-squareRyanGosling [none/use name]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-21 year agoThe reasoning that “the CIA carried out a complex assassination plot and failed to place witnesses to implicate a patsy” is dumber
minus-squareRedDawn [he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoNo it’s not. All of the evidence points to that being the case. Is it possible you’re just not familiar with the facts of the case?
Your reasoning seems pretty backwards, “there’s no evidence he did it, so he probably did” is what your comment reads like.
The reasoning that “the CIA carried out a complex assassination plot and failed to place witnesses to implicate a patsy” is dumber
No it’s not. All of the evidence points to that being the case. Is it possible you’re just not familiar with the facts of the case?