• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Is it not enough that trees look better?

      IDK why you have to choose one or the other, though.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Why would that be enough when we’re talking keeping a house cool?

        I am VERY pro-tree. A lack of trees is why I moved (and why I decided against buying a few homes)… But trees are not a “better idea” for this purpose so it was a useless statement to make

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Those links discuss cooling outdoor spaces. They don’t compete with awnings for keeping sunlight from warming up your house unless you plant them close enough to do so and come with a ton of downsides (roof damage, leaves clogging gutters, roots breaking pipes and foundation)…not to mention how long it takes a tree to grow tall enough to provide that sort of shade

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          Trees will shade far more surface area than just a window. I’ve got 9 around my house. They block direct sun through the windows all summer. While not blocking any light in the winter. They also keep the siding and sections of the roof cool.

      • KillingTimeItself
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        while i don’t disagree, we should probably stop building suburbia as that would solve our problem. Suburbs completely decimate everything in the way and require replanting of the entire foliage, often leading to really shitty growth.