Thanks for the EDIT because I thought I had really missed something.
I am addicted to Arch and the AUR but it is precisely that it is NOT Arch that makes Vanilla look attractive. Do I REALLY need multiple new kernels per month like Arch gives me?
Having a more stable base sounds like a great idea. Using containers to get access to the Arch repositories and the AUR on top of Debian sounds even better. Vanilla bakes support for that scenario right in.
OK but Debian is the best distro outside of this world.
The operating system used for key station functions is the Debian Linux distribution.[258] The migration from Microsoft Windows to Linux was made in May 2013 for reasons of reliability, stability and flexibility
deleted by creator
Thanks for the EDIT because I thought I had really missed something.
I am addicted to Arch and the AUR but it is precisely that it is NOT Arch that makes Vanilla look attractive. Do I REALLY need multiple new kernels per month like Arch gives me?
Having a more stable base sounds like a great idea. Using containers to get access to the Arch repositories and the AUR on top of Debian sounds even better. Vanilla bakes support for that scenario right in.
deleted by creator
I got your joke ( it was not subtle ). I have absolutely no idea why that would prevent me from making my comment.
I’m afraid basing their distro off TempleOS would be a bit too hard.
OTOH one gets Holly C, so it might be worth.
deleted by creator
Very curious. I didn’t know this. I tried verifying this, but didn’t manage to do so.
So, I got to ask; Was this just a joke? Or is there (some) truth to this claim?
deleted by creator
OK but Debian is the best distro outside of this world.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Space_Station
deleted by creator