@[email protected] to [email protected] • 11 months agothere is another, far more dangerous...lemmy.worldimagemessage-square146fedilinkarrow-up1679
arrow-up1679imagethere is another, far more dangerous...lemmy.world@[email protected] to [email protected] • 11 months agomessage-square146fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink11•11 months agoThere was one with mohammed included too in a french satirical paper, but it was sometimes in the -70 or -80. Much cooler times.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink23•11 months ago…didn’t that French newspaper then much later end up getting shot up? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Hebdo_shooting
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•11 months agoI think it’s the same but I’m not sure. The shooting was like 40 years later though so not relevant to the mohammed orgy images.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•11 months agoIt was shot up by people who were mad that the journal was regularly doing drawings like that.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•11 months agoIt’s not that specific drawing, it’s that they still make drawings like it regularly.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•edit-211 months agoWell yes, but nobody cated for 30 years so they didn’t do it during that time. Or not at all as provocatively.
There was one with mohammed included too in a french satirical paper, but it was sometimes in the -70 or -80. Much cooler times.
…didn’t that French newspaper then much later end up getting shot up?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Hebdo_shooting
I think it’s the same but I’m not sure. The shooting was like 40 years later though so not relevant to the mohammed orgy images.
It was shot up by people who were mad that the journal was regularly doing drawings like that.
Yes but that was 30-40 years later.
It’s not that specific drawing, it’s that they still make drawings like it regularly.
Well yes, but nobody cated for 30 years so they didn’t do it during that time. Or not at all as provocatively.