EDIT: For clarification, I feel that the current situation on the ground in the war (vs. say a year ago) might indicate that an attack on Russia might not result in instant nuclear war, which is what prompted my question. I am well aware of the “instant nuclear Armageddon” opinion.

Serious question. I don’t need to be called stupid. I realize nuclear war is bad. Thanks!

    • Jimmybander
      link
      fedilink
      810 months ago

      NATO would ensure that the US is involved. We’re aligned with the Europeans.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      610 months ago

      Even without US. UK has nukes, France has nukes. You don’t need a lot to destroy Russia. Basically just two.