This is a misleading perspective. Why would you need to codify “settled law?” SCOTUS had ruled that it was a constitutional right already so you wouldn’t need a separate law.
You’re also ignoring Casey. It wasn’t just Roe.
They also don’t typically say they’re “pro-abortion.”
The infographic states “facts” that weren’t relevant at the time.
Funny how conservatives have to more or less literally always resort to dishonest arguments. It’s just so fucking rare to see one who’s capable of good faith argumentation
“Conservatives” aren’t a real thing, they are masked fascists, unable to argue in good faith by definition. Open fascists are what you see when “conservatives” argue in good faith.
This is a misleading perspective. Why would you need to codify “settled law?” SCOTUS had ruled that it was a constitutional right already so you wouldn’t need a separate law.
You’re also ignoring Casey. It wasn’t just Roe.
They also don’t typically say they’re “pro-abortion.”
The infographic states “facts” that weren’t relevant at the time.
Don’t bother. They’re a conservative arguing in bad faith. Their comment history (especially comments like this) makes that abundantly clear.
Funny how conservatives have to more or less literally always resort to dishonest arguments. It’s just so fucking rare to see one who’s capable of good faith argumentation
“Conservatives” aren’t a real thing, they are masked fascists, unable to argue in good faith by definition. Open fascists are what you see when “conservatives” argue in good faith.
They have to invent boogeymen because they don’t want to admit that there isn’t really a monster under their beds.