• LalSalaamComrade
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Without prior information about the company, one would consider it to be harmless, and not see for what it is: a mass-surveillance software. And look, fair point about ad revenue, but unfortunately, this could still cause real, irreversible damage.

      Most people over here - well, on the internet in general, are tech-illiterate. Sure, they may “know” how to use a mouse, or a keyboard, or use apps but they don’t understand or take software licenses seriously - I mean, there’s anarchist and leftist power-users and software devs, who enforce copy-farleft and hippocratic licenses in their software, but non-tech people don’t understand the significance of FSF-approved licenses.

      They also probably use operating systems, which run telemetry services behind the scene, as well as embed advertisement ids to track trends, collect and share them without the permission of the user. Everything is so fucked up.

      • buckykat [none/use name]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        710 months ago

        That’s all true, but I don’t even consider adblocking to be high level power user stuff so much as basic bare minimum usability.