Dude just loves riling himself up into a frenzy, doesn’t he? I guess he was mad that Hasan was going to interview Obama, which never even happened, and now he thinks Hasan is a “genocide supporter” because a random YouTube clip he came across that said “Hasan supports Kamala’s policies”, which he never even watched and was most likely just clipped. Hasan isn’t perfect, but fuck, you think at least him going to the DNC as a journalist would be considered fair from BE. Wild.

  • footfaults [none/use name]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1910 months ago

    reads a multi paragraph post

    Calls it deeply unserious but does not respond with any detail

    I’m the unserious one?

      • footfaults [none/use name]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        710 months ago

        I’m sorry you feel that I would reply in bad faith. I don’t understand why I would come across that way and frankly it’s hurtful that you think that.

      • Walk_On [he/him]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        9
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Respectfully disagree with the mods decision to delete this. Equating Hasan with AOC is an ignorant statement to make due to evidence of him being far more radical than her. Thus any attempt for me to reply to their argument in good faith, I feel, is tainted from the get-go.

          • SeekTheDeletion [none/use name]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            710 months ago

            bill gates is the #1 donor to alleviating Malaria and has likely saved millions of lives

            are we going to adopt the Bill Gates political platform now?

            • Llituro [he/him, they/them]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              910 months ago

              surely you’re not equivocating medical colonialism and giving money to support a worker’s union that your “boss” opposes. that would be a genuinely deranged equivocation.

              but you’re clearly on a real tear here and in need of some grass touching, so i’ll be blocking you if you feel the need to continue to pop off at me. you are clearly scrolling this thread for hours looking for people to try to argue with and it’s seriously neither healthy nor productive.

              • SeekTheDeletion [none/use name]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                510 months ago

                my point is that money for charity, even if it were a good cause, is not any reason to support someone. It just means they’re rich. Rich evil fucks do great things through philanthropy all the time to absolve themselves, it means nothing.