Dirt_Owl [comrade/them, they/them] to [email protected]English • 9 months agoOh nohexbear.netimagemessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up180
arrow-up180imageOh nohexbear.netDirt_Owl [comrade/them, they/them] to [email protected]English • 9 months agomessage-square37fedilink
minus-squareCthulhusIntern [he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish19•9 months agoIf you’re going to make a movie about a superhero who has outdated values, you already have the perfect superhero for that in Captain America. Why Superman?
minus-squareSulvor [he/him, undecided]linkfedilinkEnglish19•9 months agoFunny answer: They gotta tap into the unironic Homelander fan demographic Real answer: Marvel vs DC. Everything Marvel has to tie into the overly convoluted MCU and spawn 2-3 submovies
minus-squareBodyBySisyphus [he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish16•9 months agoCaptain America is owned by a different money-grubbing corporate Goliath
minus-squareEricthescruffy [he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish7•9 months agoCaptain America is Marvel. Superman is DC. …nah…its really not anymore complicated than that.
If you’re going to make a movie about a superhero who has outdated values, you already have the perfect superhero for that in Captain America. Why Superman?
Funny answer: They gotta tap into the unironic Homelander fan demographic
Real answer: Marvel vs DC. Everything Marvel has to tie into the overly convoluted MCU and spawn 2-3 submovies
Captain America is owned by a different money-grubbing corporate Goliath
Captain America is Marvel. Superman is DC. …nah…its really not anymore complicated than that.