No one even thought to ask about it in the debate.

ITT: people resistant to the idea that what the judicial branch is doing is seriously wrong.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    25
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Chuck Schumer introduced the ‘no kings act’ which, if passed into law, would:

    1. Reaffirm that president’s and vice president’s do not have immunity for actions that violate U.S. criminal law
    2. Remove the supreme court’s appellate jurisdiction for all actions challenging the constitutionality of this legislation (referring to the no kings act I believe)
    3. Establish additional jurisdiction and procedural guardrails. Allowing the United States to bring criminal action against a President or Vice President in any applicable district Court.

    I think this is a good stop gap and I will be emailing my senators and representative to support this bill

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      107 months ago

      They need the house and the senate for a start. Trump and Kamala are neck and neck and the stars are aligned for a GOP win. We are pushing uphill and everyone’s sitting on their laurels hoping it sorts itself out.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          You only say that because you’re in another country and the feds don’t have jurisdiction. Wish they did. I’d like to see them haul you off.

              • Gadg8eer
                link
                fedilink
                English
                17 months ago

                Oh, like I’d have access to explosives. I’ll break his fucking nose. Instant death. And one person hitchhiking to wherever is going to be invisible without a phone on them.

              • Gadg8eer
                link
                fedilink
                English
                17 months ago

                Oh, you wish. This is personal. I will singlehandedly kill every human I ever encounter from now on. I hate you all.