• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    149 months ago

    We need regulations. It is dangerous to operate a vehicle if oncoming traffic makes it that difficult to see anything in your own lane.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      39 months ago

      If we won’t regulate guns despite school shootings, what hope is there to regulate cars? (Unless someone rich can get a cut?) Apparently someone else’s freedumb to do dangerous things is my own freedom to stfu:-(.

      All Praise and Honor be to our glorious Electoral College, may it forever prevent us from making dumb decisions such as “preventing needless deaths”.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        39 months ago

        Oh, yeah, of course it is not going to happen in the US. Force a pickup truck to aim their lights at the road instead of other drivers’ eyes? Political suicide. But I’d still like it to be regulated.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          09 months ago

          It is. You want it enforced too?

          Even here where there are mandatory annual inspections meant to catch these things, no one ever checks headlights beyond whether they turn on and off

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            29 months ago

            Even here where there are mandatory annual inspections meant to catch these things, no one ever checks headlights beyond whether they turn on and off

            German TÜV inspections absolutely check that the headlights aren’t foggy and are aligned correctly

    • lnxtx (xe/xem/xyr)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19 months ago

      In the Europe we have the regulations, it still sucks. Especially OEM “active-matrix” LEDs.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        This is why regulations should be about the behavior they want to see and not the technology used.

        The goal is not to blind drivers; companies should be able to use whatever tech they want, but they should get fined every time their tech doesn’t work as expected in the real world.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        19 months ago

        How? We only read the good things about active matrix headlights, not how they behave in the real world

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      99 months ago

      The problem isn’t LEDs though. The technology isn’t what’s making it bright.

      The regulation needs to be specific about what they want the end result to be, not about the specific technology used.

      Like: there should be a mode of operation where oncoming traffic at x distance, seated at y height, on level roads should not experience more than z brightness.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        29 months ago

        I think it is LED technology. LEDs have a very small bandwidth. Even white leds are just three very small small bandwidth emissions.

        The very tight intensity in such a small bandwidth is hard on the eyes. Even when compared with the same power of older lighting technology, which has a comparatively massive bandwidth.

        LEDs could be designed to compensate for this better. They could add more different colours of LEDs to the matrix that makes up white LEDs.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        49 months ago

        Or maybe actually enforce our existing laws on this, and make actual punishments for when people modify their cars and don’t align their headlights.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          39 months ago

          Going after random people is harder and worse than going after the manufacturers of products.

          Unless you want police shooting black people because their lights were “misaligned”