@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 9 months agostars & sharksmander.xyzimagemessage-square56fedilinkarrow-up1861
arrow-up1861imagestars & sharksmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 9 months agomessage-square56fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish42•9 months agoUnfortunately (or fortunately?) this appears to be untrue. Polaris is a cluster of stars formed about 2 billion years ago. Sharks originated about 450 million years ago. One star of Polaris (Aa) appears to be 50 million years old, but it seems likely due to a collision of stars which added mass to it.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish12•9 months agoBut polaris Aa is the only visible star with naked eye. So that can be called formation of star?
Unfortunately (or fortunately?) this appears to be untrue.
Polaris is a cluster of stars formed about 2 billion years ago. Sharks originated about 450 million years ago.
One star of Polaris (Aa) appears to be 50 million years old, but it seems likely due to a collision of stars which added mass to it.
So it’s technically not wrong.
And yet, technically wrong
Schrödinger’s fact.
But polaris Aa is the only visible star with naked eye. So that can be called formation of star?