Sjmarf to People [email protected] • 9 months agoThe value of xsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square139fedilinkarrow-up11.14K
arrow-up11.14KimageThe value of xsh.itjust.worksSjmarf to People [email protected] • 9 months agomessage-square139fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish8•edit-29 months agoNah, the imagery tricks you. 180 degrees to a line. 180 degrees inside a triangle. So you can gather the inside unlabeled angle on the triangle on the left is only 80 degrees: (180-[60+40]) So you then know it’s 100 on the right side of that +35 leaves you with 45 degrees left for the top of the right one. 180-45=. 135 degrees
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink6•9 months agoAlso if you add up all visible angles you get 135, so I’m sold on that alone. No no no, I won’t hear any rebuttals.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink24•9 months ago135, that’s not a 90 degree angle in the problem. Just visually.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink7•9 months agoOh that’s just a cheap trick. You are right, it’s 80 degrees despite looking like 90 degrees.
minus-squareStomatalinkfedilinkEnglish1•9 months agoYou are right that is 80° so the value of x will be 135°
I think 125
Nah, the imagery tricks you. 180 degrees to a line. 180 degrees inside a triangle.
So you can gather the inside unlabeled angle on the triangle on the left is only 80 degrees: (180-[60+40])
So you then know it’s 100 on the right side of that +35 leaves you with 45 degrees left for the top of the right one.
180-45=. 135 degrees
Also if you add up all visible angles you get 135, so I’m sold on that alone. No no no, I won’t hear any rebuttals.
135, that’s not a 90 degree angle in the problem. Just visually.
Oh that’s just a cheap trick. You are right, it’s 80 degrees despite looking like 90 degrees.
You are right that is 80° so the value of x will be 135°