@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 9 months agoCheekymander.xyzimagemessage-square227fedilinkarrow-up11.22K
arrow-up11.22KimageCheekymander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 9 months agomessage-square227fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish8•9 months agoMy teachers used to say the same about Wikipedia. I did edit heavily, this is 3 outputs combined including a fact check this using Wikipedia It does not fail on such basic questions, “fact check this:” in a new instance works more reliably then asking a human.
minus-squareladlinkfedilinkEnglish3•9 months agoI think the hate is a bit unwarranted, but be wary that it does sometimes fail anything
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•8 months agoand they’re correct about not using wikipedia as a source, you use wikipedia as a summary and then verify the information in the ACTUAL sources it cites
My teachers used to say the same about Wikipedia.
I did edit heavily, this is 3 outputs combined including a fact check this using Wikipedia
It does not fail on such basic questions, “fact check this:” in a new instance works more reliably then asking a human.
I think the hate is a bit unwarranted, but be wary that it does sometimes fail anything
and they’re correct about not using wikipedia as a source, you use wikipedia as a summary and then verify the information in the ACTUAL sources it cites