• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    89 months ago

    You guys need some anatomy lessons. Women are born with all the oocytes (eggs) they will ever have. They don’t make them on demand like dudes do sperm. So it is entirely accurate to say any children a woman will have are already in her ovaries, barring circumstances like surrogacy, adoption, etc.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      269 months ago

      I’m not saying that eggs are not inside the ovaries, I’m saying that eggs are not children.

        • Dragon Rider (drag)
          link
          fedilink
          English
          49 months ago

          And neither are fetuses. Birth turns a fetus into a child. His grandchildren don’t exist yet.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          59 months ago

          Which is what I said in my post that uid0grid0 responded to, saying that I needed anatomy lessons.

          Sperm is not a child.
          An egg is not a child.
          A fertilized egg is also not a child, but some people think it is.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            19 months ago

            Some people also don’t take this anywhere that serious and y’all’s conversation seems really silly. Nobody on Lemmy (within reason, I’m sure there are idiots here too) is going to seriously argue that either gamete is a child.

            These types of conversations are the ones that make me question just how prevalent autism is on Lemmy. People engage in wordplay and don’t literally mean what they say all the time yet these types of comments are 90% on posts like this.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              29 months ago

              The comment I originally replied to wasn’t word play.

              that’s realistically where they ACTUALLY are. If the grandchild is already inside the daughters overies, that means she’s already pregnant.

              I think what’s going on here, and what often does, is that people don’t read a reply as a reply to a specific comment chain. They instead see it as a reply to the post itself or a stand alone comment.