Pricefield | Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Marxism-Fennekinism to [email protected]English • 2 years ago

Primes

lemmy.ml

message-square
74
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • [email protected]
700

Primes

lemmy.ml

Marxism-Fennekinism to [email protected]English • 2 years ago
message-square
74
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • [email protected]
  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    7•2 years ago

    Often things hold true for all primes except 2. You come across things like “for all non two primes”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      5•
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Any examples? Sounds like you mean the reason why one is excluded from the primes because of the fundamental theorem of arithmetic.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1•
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I just remember it from numberphile, I don’t remember what videos sorry.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          4•
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Wow that was fast I just edited my previous comment and you probably mean “1 and prime numbers” by numberphile with james grime.

      • Kogasa
        link
        fedilink
        3•
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        No, he’s right. “For any odd prime” is a not-unheard-of expression. It is usually to rule out 2 as a trivial case which may need to be handled separately.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat's_theorem_on_sums_of_two_squares

        https://www.jstor.org/stable/2047029

        https://www.jstor.org/stable/2374361

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1•2 years ago

          It’s not unheard of no, but if you have to rule out two for some reason it’s because of some other arbitrary choice. In the first instance (haven’t yet looked at the second and third one) it has to do with the fact that a sum of “two” was chosen arbitrary. You can come up with other things that requires you to exclude primes up to five.

          • Kogasa
            link
            fedilink
            1•2 years ago

            Okay? Like I said, it’s usually to rule out cases where 2 is a trivial edge case. It’s common enough that “for any odd prime / let p be an odd prime” is a normal expression. That’s all.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2•2 years ago

      Like what? Genuine question, have never heard of this.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1•2 years ago

        In the drawer in the living room in the house in my town in my state in my country.

[email protected]

[email protected]
Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
  • 48 users / day
  • 250 users / week
  • 872 users / month
  • 5.19K users / 6 months
  • 3 subscribers
  • 13.3K Posts
  • 287K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • ghost_laptop
  • @[email protected]
  • Cyclohexane
  • Arthur Besse
  • UI: 0.18.4
  • BE: 0.18.2
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org