“As a citizen of a country openly financing genocide, and as a family that experienced South African Apartheid, the endorsement was an opportunity to repudiate justifications for the widespread targeting of journalists and ongoing war on children.”
“As a citizen of a country openly financing genocide, and as a family that experienced South African Apartheid, the endorsement was an opportunity to repudiate justifications for the widespread targeting of journalists and ongoing war on children.”
The owner already walked backed the statement and said he had his own reasons, different than his daughter’s support of Palestine.
Disappointing the owner would do that, but this still builds the narrative so it’s still a win regardless of what he says now.
Daughter: I’m not endorsing Kamala because she’s supporting Israel.
Owner: I’m not endorsing Kamala because she’s isn’t supporting Israel enough.