@[email protected] to Political [email protected] • 6 months agoHow dare you...lemmy.worldimagemessage-square209fedilinkarrow-up11.83K
arrow-up11.83KimageHow dare you...lemmy.world@[email protected] to Political [email protected] • 6 months agomessage-square209fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•6 months agoOnly a civil case, not a criminal conviction.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•6 months agoIt means a judge found that enough evidence existed to conclude he more likely than not raped as opposed to beyond a shadow of a doubt same standard of proof as If I did it OJ
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink9•6 months agoMy experience whit those folks is that you can’t extrapolate observations to make conclusions about the past. So basically they throw away any inductive reasoning that would be detrimental to their pet belief.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink31•6 months agoIt wasn’t a criminal proceeding, but he was found at fault or whatever the civil court equivalent is
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink17•6 months agoThe civil court equivalent is being adjudged liable.
Was he actually convicted of that though?
Only a civil case, not a criminal conviction.
It means a judge found that enough evidence existed to conclude he more likely than not raped as opposed to beyond a shadow of a doubt same standard of proof as If I did it OJ
My experience whit those folks is that you can’t extrapolate observations to make conclusions about the past.
So basically they throw away any inductive reasoning that would be detrimental to their pet belief.
It wasn’t a criminal proceeding, but he was found at fault or whatever the civil court equivalent is
The civil court equivalent is being adjudged liable.