• @[email protected]
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    09 months ago

    Obviously you are not aware a Quantum does not operate like a conventional computer. That’s fine. No reason to go further.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      09 months ago

      Oh, but I am. That’s why I said what I said. Even if they have one, it will be severely lacking; indicated by where public research is at.

      • @[email protected]
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        09 months ago

        You can’t even concede that Quantum computing is not convententual computing, why would your idea of research be valid?

          • @[email protected]
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            The OP added conventional computing to their verbiage because they knew what they said was not true of Quantim computing. Thus my response.

            Same as you adding the word public to research. Neither of us has any idea on the extent of research by Google, IBM and especially the NSA. Having worked in R&D before, I can tell you that not 50% is known to the public. The NSÀ, who run their own development and research-nothing at all. So, I consider your research argument faulty on its face…