How is allowing the person who will support even more genocide better?
you think you’re going to provide a new argument I havent heard in the last year with this hot take?
if you want to discuss shades of genocides you’re comfortable with. feel free. I’m not interested. I stop at any. I’m sorry your preferred candidate didn’t meet that very low bar and lost. truly I am. learn from this and demand better.
and frankly? she lost. it was already demonstrated how absolutely horrible of a campaign she ran, empirically. I no longer need to argue on this topic anymore. the proof is in the pudding. you guys supported a genocidal candidate in a party that loathes violence and tried absolutely toxic brow beating people with 'lesser evil` nonsense so they tuned out and didn’t vote for you.
you were warned. we told you what we were doing. and you decided that ‘genocide is a good hill to die on for harris’. even if you magically convinced me it was in my best interest she win (which you didn’t need to, I already knew this, Im from a safe state, I could have just let you idiots blissfully lose); you’d still need to manage 19.9999million more people. 🤷
next time learn that convincing 1 person they need to shift (harris) is the easier target. esp for something as trivial as don’t genocide.
Pretty impressive since I’m in Ireland. And you’re the one trying to justify not voting.
Who said they didnt vote? If you support a genocide you are the problem.
Aww dude. Get off the high horse more a moment before the next thing comes along and you forget all Palestine.
How is allowing the person who will support even more genocide better?
you think you’re going to provide a new argument I havent heard in the last year with this hot take?
if you want to discuss shades of genocides you’re comfortable with. feel free. I’m not interested. I stop at any. I’m sorry your preferred candidate didn’t meet that very low bar and lost. truly I am. learn from this and demand better.
and frankly? she lost. it was already demonstrated how absolutely horrible of a campaign she ran, empirically. I no longer need to argue on this topic anymore. the proof is in the pudding. you guys supported a genocidal candidate in a party that loathes violence and tried absolutely toxic brow beating people with 'lesser evil` nonsense so they tuned out and didn’t vote for you.
you were warned. we told you what we were doing. and you decided that ‘genocide is a good hill to die on for harris’. even if you magically convinced me it was in my best interest she win (which you didn’t need to, I already knew this, Im from a safe state, I could have just let you idiots blissfully lose); you’d still need to manage 19.9999million more people. 🤷
next time learn that convincing 1 person they need to shift (harris) is the easier target. esp for something as trivial as don’t genocide.