And I’m being serious. I feel like there might be an argument there, I just don’t understand it. Can someone please “steelman” that argument for me?

  • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
    link
    fedilink
    06 months ago

    Which do you choose: genocide or WORSE genocide? You have to pick one. Not picking either gets you the latter by default. Make a choice.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        06 months ago

        It’s a stupid question. But that’s the reality. So genocide or worse genocide? If you say neither, it’s probably going to be worse genocide.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          06 months ago

          What group of people could Democrats kill that would leave you unable to support either party? Clearly, it’s not Arabs.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            More people than the Republicans would. And then I would vote Republican. Because that’s the choice on election day.

            Edit: if all you’re doing is not voting, you do nothing to help anyone. If you are actually helping in meaningful ways, then voting to pick the easier opponent does not undermine your work.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              16 months ago

              There’s absolutely no logical reason to believe that. Democrats have escalated war on three fronts with nuclear armed superpowers, and armed a genocide.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                There are the words straight out of Trump’s mouth. If you believe that Democrats will kill more people than Republicans, that’s a completely different conversation. Though it still mostly boils down to: genocide or worse genocide, pick one, and if you don’t pick, you’re likely to get worse genocide.