@[email protected] to Science [email protected]English • 7 months agoAnon questions our energy sectorslrpnk.netimagemessage-square385fedilinkarrow-up11.18Kcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up11.18KimageAnon questions our energy sectorslrpnk.net@[email protected] to Science [email protected]English • 7 months agomessage-square385fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•7 months agoA nuclear accident with 1 attributed death and studies showing no discernable increase in cancer rates for residents in the surrounding regions that happened alongside a tidal wave with thousands of deaths is clearly evidence nuclear is bad.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•7 months agoThere’s been a few more disasters. Fukushima is notable because if they had built for flooding they would have been fine. But that cost money.
A nuclear accident with 1 attributed death and studies showing no discernable increase in cancer rates for residents in the surrounding regions that happened alongside a tidal wave with thousands of deaths is clearly evidence nuclear is bad.
There’s been a few more disasters. Fukushima is notable because if they had built for flooding they would have been fine. But that cost money.