NegativeNull to politics @lemmy.world • 2 years ago“Is Fish Meat?” One Justice’s Answer Shows Why the Supreme Court Is So Broken.slate.comexternal-linkmessage-square117fedilinkarrow-up1362
arrow-up1362external-link“Is Fish Meat?” One Justice’s Answer Shows Why the Supreme Court Is So Broken.slate.comNegativeNull to politics @lemmy.world • 2 years agomessage-square117fedilink
minus-squareBarqsHasBitelinkfedilinkEnglish14•edit-22 years agoIt’s not about Scalia, it’s explaining the concept of justices making rulings based on their own identity and beliefs instead of facts and logic. To, you know, explain “All the current shit going on with the SC”.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•2 years agoBribery, corrruption, and buying court decisions are the issues of today. Personal identity and beliefs don’t factor in when its already bought and paid for.
minus-squareBarqsHasBitelinkfedilinkEnglish2•2 years agoPoints to Roe v wade, EPA “major decisions”, etc.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•2 years agoBought and paid for. These SC justices are employees of the people that bribe them.
minus-squareBarqsHasBitelinkfedilinkEnglish2•2 years agoBribery in many forms exists, but they are making decisions based on their identity. Something tells me you didn’t read the article, you should.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•2 years agoScallia may have, but it got him killed in the end.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•2 years agoIf they have to go back 7 years to being up an example, that would indicate it is very rare they use only their identity to determine rulings. I don’t doubt they often ignore science but this article indicates that is not the case. Is there not something recent they could refer to?
It’s not about Scalia, it’s explaining the concept of justices making rulings based on their own identity and beliefs instead of facts and logic. To, you know, explain “All the current shit going on with the SC”.
Bribery, corrruption, and buying court decisions are the issues of today.
Personal identity and beliefs don’t factor in when its already bought and paid for.
Points to Roe v wade, EPA “major decisions”, etc.
Bought and paid for.
These SC justices are employees of the people that bribe them.
Bribery in many forms exists, but they are making decisions based on their identity. Something tells me you didn’t read the article, you should.
Scallia may have, but it got him killed in the end.
If they have to go back 7 years to being up an example, that would indicate it is very rare they use only their identity to determine rulings.
I don’t doubt they often ignore science but this article indicates that is not the case. Is there not something recent they could refer to?