deleting this

  • masterofn001
    link
    fedilink
    7
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I am not. And I’ve never had this discussion.

    Always on vs the additional option of blocking internet until the VPN connects.

    The second option is more system level?

    Using shizuku (rish) in termux I checked the active links with VPN on and then force stopped / killed the VPN in terminal and checked again. The VPN tunnel disappeared but the dummy kill switch tunnels remained. I could not access any network connection.

    *The routing table also maintains the dummy kill switch

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      37 months ago

      (oh sorry, but) I’ve heard this argument before. All I can say is that in my experience, when the system is out of memory, it kills some process (e.g. the UI) which upon restarting resets the networking

      • masterofn001
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        You’ll be happy to know I just force killed :

        Android system
        Google services framework
        Network
        System UI
        System WiFi Resources
        Wi-Fi
        Settings
        System connectivity resources
        Secure UI service

        The results are the same

        VPN kill switch prevents network access.

        *later, when I’m connected to a PC, I’ll try killing/restarting userspace, shell, and user to see if I can get the kill switch to fail. (If I try those now it may kill shizuku which relies on shell - not sure.)

        I’ll also see if I can’t force lmk to kill all the memory.

        In cmd settings list secure these may be some part of what keeps the system from allowing a connection.

        always_on_vpn_lockdown=1 always_on_vpn_lockdown_whitelist=