• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      137 months ago

      I disagree. Few things are truly neutral. What people usually consider neutral is just what’s normal at the time. The structures within which we live and express ourselves are shaped by people and institutions.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        17 months ago

        I’m not taking about neutral as in in the middle. The medium through which you communicate doesn’t favor any message over any other. So it should only be judged based on how good it is at relaying messages, not who has more access to the medium or what they use it to relay.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          27 months ago

          It does favor messages over others though. Technically mostly anyone with an internet connection can put something out there, but what actually gets to be seen by many depends largely on the communication infrastructure. Yes, the platforms we use, and who controls them.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Maybe you don’t understand the point? The post says that internet used to be a force for democracy and is now ‘weaponised’ against it. I’m pointing out that internet itself was never a force and it is silly to try to assign such values to it