• @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      69
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Sure, why not? I feel incredibly under represented knowing 9 unelected people get to decide for hundreds of millions.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        237 months ago

        Right? And more justices means more frequent turnover which means less wild swings when the ancients die. More people that need to be bribed to compromise too

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          127 months ago

          It’s always appalling to me what people will sell the American people out for. Like look at Clarence Thomas. This guy could quit the court, work in the private sector and make bank on his name alone. Instead he sells out millions of people for an RV and some fancy vacations. Da fuck is wrong with people?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      this would be the proper way to break norms. Do things where congress would have to spend every day appointing new justices unless they agree to reform a stupid constitutional provision

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        127 months ago

        But that would take power from the wealthy few and distribute it to the people, and that’s evil leftist communist Marxist fascist socialist atheist woke double plus ungood poopy mind virus trans CRT, uhh, Venezuelan conspiracy and the Clintons and Obama will enforce gay agenda to kidnap your kids, uhh, agenda. Thinking is hard, so strong daddy trump will do my thinking for me.

        /s in case it wasn’t obvious enough.