@[email protected]M to [email protected]English • edit-27 months ago lemmy.sdf.orgimagemessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up1357
arrow-up1357image lemmy.sdf.org@[email protected]M to [email protected]English • edit-27 months agomessage-square26fedilink
minus-squareEndymion_Mallornlinkfedilink3•6 months agoNope, it reads as L-level correction, so up to 7%.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•20 days agoCorrect. The author used the long numeric section to encode the data, see my incomplete analysis in another comment.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•20 days agoActually I think the QR code contains no errors, it’s all in the weird numeric data. There are still things I don’t understand but see my other comment for analysis.
That’s some fine error correction.
Up to 30%.
Nope, it reads as L-level correction, so up to 7%.
Correct. The author used the long numeric section to encode the data, see my incomplete analysis in another comment.
Actually I think the QR code contains no errors, it’s all in the weird numeric data. There are still things I don’t understand but see my other comment for analysis.