nukeM to [email protected]English • edit-25 months agoWe live in the dumbest timelinesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square91fedilinkarrow-up1686
arrow-up1686imageWe live in the dumbest timelinesh.itjust.worksnukeM to [email protected]English • edit-25 months agomessage-square91fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•5 months agoThat’s not what that means. You’ve been told what it means.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•5 months agoYes, and, like my first comment t said, it’s technically not classified.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•5 months agoSure, whatever, if it means that much to you.
minus-squarenukeOPMlinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-25 months agoThat’s how we enforce Rule 7. By actually knowing what classified means.
minus-square...m...linkfedilinkEnglish2•5 months ago…technically, it’s not not classified, it’s unclassified… …does unclassified require something to have first been classified?..semantically, certainly, but technically i have no idea…
That’s not what that means. You’ve been told what it means.
Yes, and, like my first comment t said, it’s technically not classified.
You’re still wrong
Sure, whatever, if it means that much to you.
That’s how we enforce Rule 7. By actually knowing what classified means.
Troll
…technically, it’s not not classified, it’s unclassified…
…does unclassified require something to have first been classified?..semantically, certainly, but technically i have no idea…