• @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          They broke up the Bell Stystem in 1982 because it was monopoly. Cost to consumers went down the years following. Big national monopolies are a consumer cost

          • rhythmisaprancer
            link
            fedilink
            94 months ago

            The Bell system is an inappropriate comparison. It was a monopoly; it was not what @[email protected] is talking about. Corporate monopolies were bad then, and are bad now, which is likely a factor in why New York is doing this.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            74 months ago

            My town’s municipal power is significantly less expensive than all the national grid/eversource towns surrounding it.

    • HubertManne
      link
      fedilink
      94 months ago

      should be the case with all of them. If you don’t have two seperate, distinct hookups then there is no competition. And really should be half a dozen options.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        24 months ago

        I have exactly 1 option of a variety of types. ATT fiber, ATT DSL, Spectrum cable, T-Mobile home service, etc. There is literally no overlap at each level. I suppose you could call that competition but the only ones really competing are ATT and Spectrum, and that’s only been in the last 6 months.