@[email protected] to Science [email protected]English • 5 months agoNom nomslrpnk.netimagemessage-square148fedilinkarrow-up11.58K
arrow-up11.58KimageNom nomslrpnk.net@[email protected] to Science [email protected]English • 5 months agomessage-square148fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish38•5 months agoFor a while, I’ve seen “<” and “>” as a slanted “=”, which is to say, these numbers are not equal, and the larger side is the larger number and the smaller side is the smaller number. Works for me, IDK.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish21•5 months agoBut shouldn’t it be 8 < 1 because the eight is heavier and squeezes the bars of the = together?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish20•5 months agoI’m with you, the croc is an opportunist and will eat the smaller, easier prey.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•5 months agoits not a scale exactly but the size of the ends shows the size of the numbers.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish6•5 months ago But shouldn’t it be 8 < 1 That would be a pair of scissors, on its way to cut the number 1.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish6•5 months agoNo, since it’s bigger it stretches the lines apart :)
For a while, I’ve seen “<” and “>” as a slanted “=”, which is to say, these numbers are not equal, and the larger side is the larger number and the smaller side is the smaller number.
Works for me, IDK.
But shouldn’t it be 8 < 1 because the eight is heavier and squeezes the bars of the = together?
I’m with you, the croc is an opportunist and will eat the smaller, easier prey.
its not a scale exactly but the size of the ends shows the size of the numbers.
That would be a pair of scissors, on its way to cut the number 1.
No, since it’s bigger it stretches the lines apart :)