• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    17 months ago

    It’s a bummer that we can’t be more apolitical. I mean, I know it’s doable. It would be hard to vet people, but probably doable.

    Maybe AI will be of some use to humanity and will be fed case data one day and then it can bring the odd ones to the top.

    Who knows? Not me, I’m just an idiot.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      47 months ago

      AI is inherently biased by the input. It’s glorified analytics and predictive text/pixel software that relies on existing data. So what’s best is what we’re doing. It would just as likely recommend more executions.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        17 months ago

        I mean, maybe it could analyze data and show where people have been convicted with no evidence so that humans wouldn’t have to go digging for it.

        I don’t know. I don’t know anything about it really.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          27 months ago

          Everyone is convicted with some evidence. The problem for a lot of these actual innocence cases is the evidence is either not actually very compelling or made up. For example, a shitty eyewitness saying they saw the defendant do it is still evidence, even if it turns out they’re wrong.