• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    332 years ago

    And their roads? What about their roads? Do their highways pay for themselves? Why is it that public transit must always be budget neutral or make a profit, but it’s perfectly okay if, like in the US, the government pays $10 for every $1 a driver spends on driving?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          That’s not what I’d call heavily taxed but it’s better than Germany where it’s around 50-350 annually.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        How is it that every time I learn something about the Netherlands, it only ever sounds better?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 years ago

          Because you haven’t tried moving and living there.

          It’s expensive, especially if you want to own a house, there’s just no space.

      • rroa
        link
        fedilink
        English
        102 years ago

        I’d be very interested to see some numbers here. I share the sentiment of the OP: there’s often talk about public transport being unprofitable but I haven’t come across any conversation about how much it costs to maintain our road infrastructure and how much of it is covered by taxes.

        Meanwhile, using a car to go between two cities in the Netherlands always works out cheaper than taking the train and the difference has gone up significantly in the last few years.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          From my quick search, taxes come up to 4 billion.

          Regular maintenance is 3 billion. Special projects for big repairs or new roads was 19 billion. But that also included some water infrastructure.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          Don’t really have the numbers, sorry, I just know that it’s a lot of money, especially if you have a nicer car.

          In the context of infrastructure, I don’t think comparing direct costs/income makes sense to talk about. It’s existence brings insane economical benefit, doesn’t matter if it’s roads or public transport.

          So my point is, it doesn’t make sense to try to hate on roads because of costs/income, same as it doesn’t make sense to do the same with public transport, both have their place in a much bigger system than themselves.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            It’s no hate on roads, it’s hate on injustice expectations. Why should trains make profit and cars/roads are accepted as public subsidized method of transportation?

            Plus it’s a misconception that roads bring us ‘insane economical benefit’. They cost us so so much (consider freedom, equality, environment, health and actual money) and the average citizen is certainly not the one to profit from this system.